Archive for March, 2004

Bob is Angry

Wednesday, March 31st, 2004

Dear  [LizDee],

Perhaps I should steer clear of people who know Bob. This is not the first time in the past year that he’s created problems for me with his gossip.

At any rate, let me set the record straight. I want to get to know you. Nothing more at this point, nothing less. My interest in you thus far is limited to doing that, and getting your cheeks of course. But I can’t say for sure if I want anything more yet, and won’t know that until we spend significant time together in person. I thought I communicated that to you from the start. If I haven’t, I apologize and will endeavor to do a better job at it in the future.

This was however, the message I attempted to relate to [Emmy] about us. But perhaps things got distorted as the message flowed from me to [Emmy], then to Bob, and finally to you.

Now, I admit that I have downplayed my interest in you to [Emmy], because she’s still hurting over what happened between her and I. Any time your name comes up, she gets all quiet and jealous. So to save her pain, I haven’t told her yet that I’m coming to visit you, nor that you and me talk dirty on the phone at times. This aspect of our relationship (and where it’s going) is neither hers nor Bob’s business.

Let them gossip if they need to commiserate with each other. But don’t let them drive a wedge between us.

Finally, the last time I said anything significant about you to [Emmy] was just after yours and my first email, around mid-March. Back then, I wasn’t even sure I wanted to get to know you. I had learned that you were a smoker and expressed my doubts to [Emmy] about how far things might go because of that. She knows I don’t like cigarettes.

But since then, I’ve indeed developed interest in exploring the future with you, especially since you’re trying to quit. Rest assured that I’ve been as honest with everyone involved here as I can be without needlessly hurting anyone.

No, you didn’t steal anybody’s boyfriend because [Emmy] and I had broken up almost a whole month before you and I began talking. She knows that.

Oh, and by the way, contrary to what Bob says, [Emmy] is no threat to you. She’s very gentle and doesn’t have a violent bone in her body. She’s not interested in fighting you and wouldn’t ever hurt you.

Perhaps we should stop talking to our exes until we see where this thing is . It sounds like both [Emmy] and Bob have axes to grind where we’re concerned. So we need to regard anything they say with suspicion. Whether intentional or not, they may be trying to ruin things for us because they’re not getting what they want, from us. You’ve said yourself how much of a storyteller Bob is, and how he blabs things that really should be kept quiet. So remember this the next time he says something about us to you.

I’ll call you later this morning to discuss further.

Tom Hesley

Emmy’s Call

Tuesday, March 30th, 2004

Dear [Emmy],

I liked your call this morning. You were in a good mood.

It’s fun learning about what different ladies like in men. That’s why I ask you about what you prefer.

The batch is up to 760 now. I’m going to shoot for 900 songs and see how that goes.

Take care, and talk to you later.

Tom Hesley

Dear Emmy

Tuesday, March 30th, 2004

Dear [Emmy],

Howdy. Things are going well. I did some writing today and am glad to be back into it a bit.

What’s the number of the Adams Mark hotel? I’ll call you to say hi.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Tom Hesley

Another Rejection

Tuesday, March 30th, 2004

[This lady rejected me because she wants to have children while I do not. So I responded as follows...]

Thanks so much for responding. I would have children with someone I’m deeply in love with. But my desire for them depends on the individual lady involved. Some ladies evoke strong paternal aspirations in me while others definitely do not. Still others produce no feeling either way, thus my “not sure” indication in my profile. I would definitely have them with a right girl.

Unfortunately, it’s hard to know from just a lady’s profile how I’d feel about it down the road. However, please know that I’m not against the idea. If, based on this you’d care to talk further, let me know. If not, I fully understand and wish you well in your search.

Take care,
Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Calling LizDee

Sunday, March 28th, 2004

Dear [LizDee],

I’ll call you here in a few minutes, on your cell phone. Stand by.

Tom Hesley

Emmy, My Buddy

Saturday, March 27th, 2004

Dear [Emmy],

Yep, I’ll come to see you once you get your own place. It’s nice that you like my voice. Yep, we’re buddies.

Tom Hesley

LizDee Misses Me

Saturday, March 27th, 2004

Dear [LizDee],

Well, I hope you got the fix you needed last night [from our phone call]. Sorry about the lateness of my call.

Yep, I got lots of music at the store yesterday, including Sexbomb. :-)

Tom Hesley

Where’s Your Box?

Friday, March 26th, 2004

Dear [LizDee],

So where is your box? Outside or inside? Is it covered up or easy for meter readers to find?

I had a good sleep. Going shopping this morning. Perhaps I’ll be able to find that Tom Jones song, Sexbomb.

Catch you later,
Tom Hesley

Is Arrogance Attractive?

Thursday, March 25th, 2004

Dear [LizDee],

Wow. You really are quite insightful. I like.

Yes, I never bought into that exaggerated self-importance stuff that guys use on women either [to attract them]. I’ve seen it applied many, many times, on buses, in bars, at bookstores, and so on. The guy doing it really looked pathetic as the lady kept rolling her eyes, hoping he’d go away, pronto. Often, men using this technique brag about their house or car, their jewelry or bank accounts, or they chatter about that upcoming business trip to Madrid. I just can’t see that a lady who didn’t find him attractive (that romantic rush) immediately upon seeing him, would be swayed to fall in love just because he has lots of money.

Chemistry knows no class boundaries. The requirement that some ladies have that the man be able to afford her high maintenance costs is not a biological one, but rather, something she has decided on an intellectual level.

That’s a big problem with society today. We try to temper our animal instincts with intellect. The result? A whole bunch of unhappy people who, over sixty percent of the time, can’t stay married more than five years. But I’m rambling. I’ll talk to you more on the phone later about this, and other sweet topics.

Tom ‘I want to be your panty hoes’ Hesley

LizDee’s Panty Hoes

Thursday, March 25th, 2004

[I'm responding here to a humorous note LizDee sent me about how being a lady's bra would help her.]

Dear   [LizDee],

I think I’d rather be your panty hoes instead. A bra would be nice though. :-)

Tom Hesley