Archive for the ‘Obsession’ Category

Boyhood Foot Fetish

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

One complicating factor I’ve found while working my love quest is my interest in pretty women’s feet.  Yes, I have an adult foot fetish, and knowing that many women vilify  guys with foot fetishes as disdainful sub human in extreme cases, helped intensify my shyness over asking ladies out as a young man.  The foot fetish or more precisely, how I though people would react to it,  made me afraid to ask anything of anyone pretty enough to arouse me sexually as a boy.  Frankly though even as a boy, I never understood why so many are so grossed out at the thought of massaging someone’s feet.  I mean, once you assure that the feet are clean, what is the difference between kissing a foot, or a hand, or a breast, or a pair of lips, or any of the genitals?  In fact, there is no difference beyond the irrational prejudices that so many hold, yet cannot explain.  Unfortunately, that impenetrable rationale never helped me much to be less afraid of rejection.

So I’d further extend the argument:  Consider that just as a gay person does not choose his sexual orientation, I did not pick my objects of sexual desire either, which primarily are the pretty legs and feet of beautiful women.  We do not choose these preferences but instead,   discover   them.  Indeed I learned of mine, not through decision, but rather through experimentation.  I found out what they already were.  I did not decide what they were.  In fact, what constitutes a ‘beautiful woman’ seemed to be programmed into me long before I understood its adult sexual ramifications.  I was born with an appreciation of certain forms of beauty.  I’ve always been drawn to tall, thin ladies with smaller feet and hands, and at least while a kid, to women in authority, like school teachers, house mothers, and teachers’ aids.  But unfortunately, their authoritarian air also made me more afraid of rejection from them.

This foot fetish has accompanied me since the start of my love quest in the beginning 1970s, and way before that even.  Indeed, the earliest recallable memories of when I was two or three years old, reveal a strong desire to sit close to pretty girls’ sexy legs, feel their radiating warmth, and smell the accompanying feminine scents of soap, shampoo, perfume, and skin softener.  I always looked forward to Mom and Dad going out for the evening, so I’d get to listen to records with the two teen-aged babysitters who lived up the street when we lived in Altoona, and sit beside them on the floor while they sat on the couch.  They never knew (I don’t think) that I thought them sexy; especially at only three or four years of age.

But in many ways, I was more easily aroused sexually as a toddler, than I’ve ever managed to be as an accomplished adult.  I so wanted to remove their shoes and massage their arches and toes.  But even at that young age, I knew that I didn’t dare try or even ask to, because there would be hell to pay if I did.   These earliest chapters in my foot fetish story could be summed up by saying that I spent a great deal of my time longing for and admiring pretty women’s feet.  Yet I was highly afraid to display this interest.  The foot fetish made me quite shy.   It suurpirsed me while journaling about this that even  as early as three years old, I was already afraid of sexual rejection.

My reaction upon seeing pretty feet was (and is still today) automatic and near instantaneous.  I never chose to experience it or not, though at times, I’ve made willful yet unsuccessful efforts to repress it.  This response seems as immediate and thoughtless as when the doctor hits the patellar ligament with that little hammer during a physical exam, and then the knee jerks forward as a result in healthy people.  My   foot fetish   is just as reflexive and, I believe, just as healthy though I must say that I still find admitting to it to some women quite difficult, and nearly impossible to own up to when I was a boy.  I was more shy back then than today.  But shyness still hampers me somewhat in my love quest; particularly in the realms of full sexual expression.  Having a preference that people by in large consider odd or strange seemed to add much to the degrees of bashfulness and lacking sexual self confidence I experienced while growing up.

Yet in spite of all the shame and resulting shyness I’ve felt for having this foot fetish, along with the intense need to conceal it, I never wanted to eliminate it, and don’t believe that I could even if I wished to.  I never saw it as a defect in my psyche but rather,  as the means to achieve lasting sexual satisfaction, assuming I can find the right women to play with.

Indeed, the foot worship sessions I’ve experienced have been so pleasing as to make most any amount of indignity toward me and my “odd” desires worth enduring.  So, it would be next to impossible to renounce that pleasure and swear to never indulge it again.  It’d be like asking a gay man to change his sexual orientation.  Not possible today.  Besides, as mentioned above, the nearly instant arrousal I experience when I glance a pretty pair of feet is so involuntary that I believe that no amount of therapy, hypnosis, or de-conditioning would rid me of it, and I’d not want to spend the money on such therapy even if I could afford it.

Thus I’ve accepted the foot fetish as a facet of me that is equally valid as my arms or my heart.  It’s a defining part of me, and I’ve never been one to want to muck with what nature has given to me.  Even as a boy, I fully accepted it.  Indeed, the better strategy has proven for me to be to find women who like their feet worshipped, rather than to drive the attraction to pretty feet out of my mind.  Should they say that I don’t measure up to their expectations because of my foot fetish, then that’s a strong clue that they don’t measure up to mine and that I should just move on.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

References

Coping With The Ultimate Rejection

Monday, June 14th, 2010

So I brought up Facebook this morning, all cheery and ready to put in another day in earnest at the love quest.  But then, I got stung in a most egregious fashion, as I noticed that a girl I’d pursued a date with a couple weeks back, now happily claims to be dating another; though she all but ignored me.  Ouch! 

She had previously marked herself as ‘single’ But a few hours ago, she set her relationship status to ‘in a relationship’.  Oooooh! 

I mean, it was bad enough that she only tersely responded to several letters I’d sent her; inviting further conversation.  In those, I sincerely detailed my life here, my career, and attempted to show my genuine interest in her by asking lots of questions about her situation.  Unfortunately, she never offered any curiosity back, and that hurt.  True, she had never asked for any attention from me.  So I had no business expecting anything in return for that which I had offered her.  But still, her coolness zinged and smarted. 

It zinged even worse this morning when I found that she’d obviously connected with someone that she thought was more interesting than me.  I mean: It’s one thing when they say  no  to my face.  But it’s much more demoralizing when they further reject by passing me by, on their way to a “better” beau.  Shucks!

I could barely get a hundred words out of her.  But this other guy got a relationship!   Now, even after forty-nine years, I still do not handle rejection as well as I’d like, and I don’t get over rejecting too well either. 

Now, as is the usual case, I’m left to ponder how to ease the sting of this love rejection.  True.  I could talk to a therapist, and indeed get some relief just because s/he represents a consoling force, a shoulder to cry on, a sounding board, a seasoned advice giver, and all the other wonderful roles that good counselors play to help their patients. 

But I’ve also found writing about my woes to be intensely cathartic, and in many ways, even more lastingly effective than just airing them to a psychoanalyst.  Writing is my way of turning lemons into lemonade and thereby discovering and sharing how I sweetened the naturally bitter juice.  I got rejected, an experience that generates strong emotions, and that’s the time that I tend to write the most creatively, and am most likely to discover solutions for that pain.  So here I am, writing now. 

So with that said, allow me in the rest of this piece to meander and write anything that seems to relieve the pain of today’s hurdle when I think of it.  Perhaps in this way, not only will I discover my own cure for the blues of getting rejected, but also help my readers with similar experiences to find the same.  A love rejection is indeed the   ultimate rejection   because it hurts more and is more humiliating than any other I know of.  But lessening its pain is entirely possible when you develop the right mind set. 

The First Love Connection

Occurrences like today’s happen so often that I may have forgotten many of the rejections from yesteryear.  But seeing that woman choose another does call to mind similar poignant experiences with [First Love]. 

In school, I dedicated my life to impressing   [First Love]   enough so that she’d agree to be my girlfriend; just as I’d attempted to impress this girl on Facebook.  I bought [First Love] cans of pop often, fixed her broken devices in electronics class, and stood always ready to serve her in any capacity she requested.  I’d engineer things so that she’d see me hard at work with the dining staff; moving pots of hot food around, changing bags in the milk dispensers, and joyfully interacting with the waitresses and the head cook.  Instinctively, I knew that showing her that I could get along well with others, and in fact that many others liked me, would encourage her to like me too. I mean: Don’t woman tend to admire guys who have lots of other admirers as well?  Absolutely!

Yet in spite of that effort, I only managed to gain marginal esteem from [First Love].  Indeed, as I understand it today, inducing romantic desire into a woman’s heart always requires much, much more than just brute-force exertion.  In fact, destiny must favor it too. 

Back then though, I did not believe in fate, as fate was so often and closely tied to God in my learning.  Indeed, I began questioning the existence of God at fifteen years of age.  Eventually as I grew less certain about God, I divorced fate from Him as I realized that the forces of fate are easily provable, while the existence of God is far less so. 

Besides, after over seven years of chasing [First Love], I could no longer ignore the reality that my efforts were yielding no fruits.  I wasted my time as I came to understand, because my voluntary attempts to instill deep affection for me in her were rarely if ever successful.  Though I believed with all my heart that I could gain her impassioned longing, her undying love never materialized.  Though I thought I could make her fall if I worked at it long and hard enough, it turned out that unlike the little engine that could,   I could not.  All the positive thinking I could muster did not alter that truth.  Simply believing that I could did not mean that I could. 

While it came about after years of this epic slog that  [First Love]   felt sorry for me and thus threw me a few crumbs of loving here and there, this compassion-based fondness was not what I wanted even though it did finally usher me into her bed; a dream that I’d prayed would come true for years.  

Though I was blessed to be one of the few people out there who got to enjoy his first love in the bedroom and in the buff, I still never fully trusted her out-of-character professes of enduring love.  How could she change so quickly and so drastically after so long?  I wondered.  Besides, her affection was unpredictable and typically invisible, and on those rare times when it did appear and then left again, I was left crying in its dusty wake.  It would joyfully come and then painfully go.  But it was usually absent.  Depressing!

It’s true that briefly in 1980, she decided much to my great pleasure, that I was “good” for her; citing my years of dedication, forthrightness, and deliberate servitude.  She thought me safe, responsive, and consistently loving by then.  So she willed herself to love me; at least for that summer anyway.  My years of toil to build inroads into her heart had apparently paid off. 

However as I think back on it, she must have ignored the importance of being   in love   in order to completely love someone, when she chose to love me.  Perhaps she preferred to dismiss or hide her need for   the chemistry   as so many people today do, because they deem it shallow and immature.  Indeed, though she argued quite well that she did in fact love me, her words were somehow hollow, and her behavior over time clearly implied otherwise; suggesting that she never really did.  Sad!

She often veered from truly loving deeds, because there was no chemistry or deep passion to keep her straight, and her will to   stay straight   was only so strong.  She’d often forget to call, and then grow impatient when I’d take offense.  She’d spend time with other men; knowing full well that she was breaking my heart.  This was the ultimate rejection. 

Yet intellectually, she believed that she   should   stay straight.  But while she truly wished with all her heart that she   could   love me, the stark truth was that she simply   did not, and neither she nor I it turned out, could find the power to change that. 

She tried to fix it by bringing her willpower to bear, and I tried by behaving in accommodating, accepting, and loving ways to egg her on.  This was easy for me at first, because I had my heart pulling for me.  Showing her loving kindness, as long as we were together, came effortlessly.  After all, I possessed the gift of deep fervor where she was concerned; a passion that I did not choose.  It came from beyond. 

But no fire ever ignited in her soul in return for me; not even after years of my relentless (and at times, obsessive) campaigning.  The universe had not gifted her as it had me.  So, all the effort in the world had not, and it seemed, would not make her fall.  Without the pathways of destiny leading to love in the first place, I could not cut one on my own. 

She decided to love me, yes.  But she never managed to fall in love with me.  What she referred to as   her love   for me, was but a labor of will and resolve; without any abiding infatuation, awe, implicit admiration, or deep seated compulsion to back it up.  Her love for me never enslaved her to me.  Indeed, she could easily choose to be here today and gone tomorrow; whereas I could not.  Though she never intended to deceive or mislead me regarding the depths of her passions, deceived and misled I nonetheless felt. 

This romantic chapter (the only one as adults in fact) in our relationship ended after less than five months.  I suspected early on that it would because in our entire twenty-two year association, we spent less than twenty nights together.  The hurtful part in all that was that I could not persuade her to regard me any more highly than she did already. 

No matter what I did or how hard I tried, I rarely received more than mere cordial replies.  She shunned my painstaking efforts, no matter how much I offered.  This further frustrated me because I found, most brutally, that I actually had far less control over her passions than I’d imagined, when I set out in sixth grade to marry her and live happily ever after in twelfth. Destiny had other plans for her that did not include me, and in the end, accepting that nature beats nurture in these endeavors proved to be the most difficult and humiliating admission to make.  My experiences show that in nature there are far greater forces at work than human willpower, and that it therefore makes no sense to shame myself, should I lose out when pitting myself against them. 

Fully appreciating the limits of my powers when it comes bringing about deeply enjoyable romantic involvements, has made getting rejected in my love quest hurt much less and thus, quicker to recover from.  The hurt from the one today is already gone actually.  At times, like this one, I can indeed get over rejection. 

In fact, I’ve come to know that fulfilling romances result from the confluence of thousands of variables; the vast majority of which we individuals do not control.  The happiest love affairs were destined to be that way before they ever occurred because those thousands of variables were in large degree, already set prior to the love birds ever meeting. 

So when I agonized excessively over rejections received as a boy and young adult, my own arrogance proved to be    the   bona fide source of the resulting pain.  Indeed it was extraordinarily bigheaded of me to think that I could manage more than just a small number of all the factors that drive just how happy lovers will ultimately be together, or even if they get started at all.  If I indeed have so little control, then why should I think myself inadequate when I’m rejected?  Crazy!

These days, I blame myself for far less when the ladies say no.  Chances are, they’re rejecting me neither because I failed to behave as I should have, nor because committed some other unsightly blunder.  Instead, they reject because they feel no. But with a truly abiding attraction, people are capable of overlooking even the most wrongheaded behaviors.  E.g. Ladies who crawl after abusive husbands. 

It appears that when they feel yes, then the voluntary behaviors have only some effect on how deeply their passions run.  I gather thus that choice-based behaviors, unless they’re unusually inconsiderate, deliberately hurtful, or crass, contribute less than expected to how quickly or deeply we fall for one another.  So, I got rejected!  But this can, at worst, only imply a small amount of personal inadequacy, since that   yes feeling   derives from so many factors beyond the controllable ones.  Just because another deems us inadequate (they   feel   no) does not mean that we are lacking; though it does mean that   they   find us lacking.  Interesting!

She may call us a jerk or he might poke fun at (as he sees them) a woman’s numerous faults.  But the only definitive thing that the rejecter is qualified to say is simply that he   does not feel yes.  Any reasons for this that he might give, whether solicited or not, are probably speculative at best, and at worst, just plain wrong. 

I say this because in light of all those thousands of variables, it’s unlikely that just one or even a few can completely determine a person’s feelings of love.  It’s not just a single reason therefore, or even five or ten that makes someone fall, or prevents them from falling.  So, it would be foolhardy for them to state one or three or five as the all encompassing, overriding factors as to why they love us or not.  It’s also bad form for the rejected to assume that they were rejected for specific reasons that they could have done something about.  Very little of this is personal therefore.  Relief!

There’s a lot more to getting someone to fall than just behaving in the right ways.  So when they fail to fall, we ought not to blame ourselves for behaving incorrectly so much.  In fact, the whole idea that we can make someone fall, given my experiences with [First Love], I now believe is a myth, because in trying, we’re pitting ourselves against fate, and attempting to control those many variables that govern her heart that simply cannot be controlled by modern man. 

Assuming we can even know what those specific variables are for each person, actually managing enough of them to make the difference would be nearly impossible at present, and for generations to come I suspect.  Different people want different things, and the lists can vary hugely from one person to the next.  The core of rejection, I submit, is more about the differences in these lists between the rejecter and the rejected than anything else; any personal inadequacies notwithstanding. 

I offer and desire what I do.  Indeed, for the most part, I neither choose what to offer, nor especially, do I choose what I desire. So I cannot rationally be faulted for it. The same is true of the people we might choose to approach for a date.  They offer and desire various things too; but have no more control over these quantities than do we.  Whether or not these vast lists mesh with loving outcomes is a product of destiny; much more than any willful choices made.  Liberating! 

So, when we encounter getting rejected, we only can rightly shoulder so much responsibility.  Thus, any shame we feel at having received rejection is in the main, misplaced.  Rejection is less a statement about our controllable qualities as people, and more a simple measure of how well these lists match up. This, I’ve found, really takes the sting out of the experience of rejection for me.  With this in mind, I handle rejection more gracefully and have even managed to completely eliminate the sting of it in recent years, from certain ladies. 

It’s true that that Facebook woman, just as   [First Love]   did years ago, chose to reject me.  I mean both could have instead, welcomed me.  Indeed, there is a level of freedom of choice here.  But is choice really all that free?  True, we all have a vast plethora of choices before us that we could make.  But in all of those, there are far fewer ones that we’d actually desire to make, and I’d never anymore, wish someone to choose to love me without feeling it as well.  So when they say no, I just conclude that for whatever reason, we’re not right for each other, and then I move on, as I have today.  

Take care. 

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Dear Miss Independent

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Hi   [Miss Independent].

You were the last one I met at this month’s foot party, between 1:15 and 1:35. Surprisingly, I had to force myself to ask you for a foot fetish session.  You were the first woman at these parties that I felt scared to approach, even though you saying yes was a virtual certainty. This shyness is one sure way I know that a lady really attracts me. So, you must be quite alluring to produce such timidity at such an accepting atmosphere as the foot party.

I’m sorry there wasn’t more time to get acquainted. But I learned enough to know that I’d enjoy meeting you again at the next party, for a much longer session. You were the 23 year old who said she had 32-inch inseams, and that in grade school, your beautifully long and sexy legs embarrassed you; but nowadays, you think them sexy. Well, they are certainly that.

I enjoyed making out with your exquisite feet and admiring your pretty legs and body from afar and up very close in this true erotic story, and loved how you cupped your arches and toes to completely cover my mouth as I lay on the floor on my back, worshiping you. For a moment, I actually preferred kissing your feet to kissing the lips of any woman. No, twenty minutes was not enough. We must do more time. Are you game?

I call you   Miss Independent,   because the first thing you said when I asked about you, was that you were a very independent person. Did you say this to show your pride at having achieved it, or were you warning me to avoid falling in love because romance just isn’t your thing? Well, don’t worry; at least not for now. Twenty minutes was too short a time for me to fall. But if I learn more of the right stuff about you the next time, I could fall. No big deal though. I’m harmless. Ask [Linda].  :-)   If you felt differently should this happen, I’d not press you. How far things go would be entirely up to you.  I just love the falling.

The most bizarre part of our session was when [Linda] walked past our suite’s open door. She saw me absorbed in my obsession, kissing your toes and ankles as I lay on my stomach before you; so thankful for my foot fetish and how it was enabling me to so completely wrap myself up in paradisiacal feelings of love and lust.  You sat on the leather couch looking aloof but pleased.  As she beheld the spectacle, she cheerfully said, “Good night, Tom!” as she was leaving. That did feel weird. I think you sensed that too because of the way you chuckled. I found it intensely erotic though, because [Linda] had just rejected me. So it felt remarkably empowering to show her that I could easily move to others, since she wished not to play the love game with me. You made forgetting about her a snap, and I thank you so much for being there at just the right time.  You pulled me out of a love I wished no longer to be in.  Again, thanks so much.

I’m once again back on neutral ground; not in love with anyone.  So I hope we meet again. [Jack] and I are working and saving for the next VIP party in July. We’re not certain if we’ll get there yet, but I’ll let you know in a later post, when we know either way. Keep your eyes on this blog for updates.  Again, nice meeting you, and the next time I see you, I’d be up for at least an hour session; perhaps more if it goes well. So write if you like. It’d be cool to read your comments here.

Enjoy the rest of your June.

Take care.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Tom’s Love Quest Summary

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

Hello.

It’s Tom here again with some background about me to help put this whole love quest thing into context.

Let’s see. I’m a 48 year old single white male. I never married, never had children, nor do I want to. I’m 5’ 8’’ tall at 179 pounds. Currently, I live where I grew up, in central, PA. However, in my working life of nearly 20 years, I’ve lived in Dayton, OH, Pittsburgh, PA, and Philadelphia, PA.

I began my education in public school. At that time, I lived at home with my parents and sisters, like most kids. But in third grade, I switched to a special needs school in Pittsburgh due to weak eyesight, which affected me since birth.

Well, if I had it my whole life you may ask, then why didn’t I switch schools sooner? Because the low vision did not lower my grades in the early years, and I liked being close to my family. The teachers in kindergarten through second grade accommodated me lovingly. They liked me and were eager to help. So my grades stayed very good, my self-confidence kept pretty high, and I got along well with the other kids.

But it got harder to keep up as the lessons grew more complicated, as they had in third grade. Kids teased me then about my thick glasses, threw rocks at me, and beat me up in the school yard at recess. I grew frustrated since I could no longer follow the training, and teachers grew impatient as I got angrier. I missed more and more of the lessons, as teachers taught more with chalk boards, overheads, and copies of their handwritten notes; which I could not read well without getting very close. If I was going to have any chance at a good education, I needed a different school; one equipped to handle low-vision kids like me. So, in February, 1970, I left the school across the street for, hopefully, a more positive learning experience in Pittsburgh.

Of course, this meant living much of the school year away from home since each way to Pittsburgh took more than two hours. So with the new school over a hundred miles away, I stayed there overnight during the week. The only times I saw my family were the weekends and on summer breaks. Initially, this adjustment hurt all of the family, and my Mom agonized for years over whether she should have sent me away. In the end though, we all agree that she chose wisely, and I’m grateful to her for sticking to it though she missed me and cried over it often. I cried too, especially on Sunday nights, for the first couple years. But I’m glad we all stuck with the new school, as it did what we’d hoped it would by giving me a second, much better chance at a decent education.

Though my vision is low, it’s always been stable, thank goodness. I have enough to be productive in many “sighted” activities. I read large print, take buses, and watch TV. I know what colors are. My favorite is a deep yet vibrant blue. I maintain the house, doing most repairs and enhancements myself. I fix computers, mow the lawn, do light construction, perform plumbing and electrical repairs, and I paint. I know how to use power tools like drills, saws, sanders, and heat guns. That great school in Pittsburgh taught me well how to better apply the vision I had to maximize my independence and productivity.

However, the biggest drawback of my reduced sight is that I cannot drive. This fact has complicated my love quest greatly since good old sweet sixteen. In fact, many women who’ve rejected me confirmed this. “I can’t date you,” they’d say with a tone that challenged my audacity to ask them out in the first place. “You don’t drive,” as though I should have known better than to seek their affections. Nonetheless, finding sustained pleasure in love remains my top priority. Though my eyes are weak, everything else is strong; including a desire to enjoy fulfilling erotic relationships.

The search has been hard for different reasons at different times. During high school, I struggled because there weren’t many girls there that I wanted. Why? The high school was small, with less than 150 boys and girls combined, and of all the girls, only four to six interested me romantically. Of these, three were too old. Plus, the remaining three were quite popular with the other boys. Thus, competition was fierce, leaving the pickings quite slim. So I had few dates in high school, and no one ever asked me out first.

I was also quite shy. The prettiest girls scared me most. The more I wanted them, the more I feared approaching them. This meant that the girls I desired most were the least likely to know that I wanted them. I never quenched my teenage thirst for great sex. Not until well after finishing high school (which, in retrospect, was probably a good thing), did I ever score. Looking back on that time from here in 2009, I’m glad I didn’t have sex and am thankful that I never got anyone pregnant. But in the 70s, I hated this abstinence forced on me as it was by the circumstances at the school, by what some described as my average looks, and my own fears.

My fear seemed my worst enemy. So, I spent the first decade or two of my love quest, trying to rid myself of it; striving first to understand it, then learning how to beat it, and finally, once I realized that I couldn’t beat it, learning to happily live with it. I’ll share how this came about in upcoming episodes.

Fear turned out to be quite the foe. I could neither silence it with alcohol, nor marijuana, nor a hundred self-help books, nor direct confrontation, and not with years of psychotherapy. Fear has been such an encompassing and basic part of my conscience that eliminating it completely proved impossible. So I’ve not destroyed it. However, I do go after what I want, even though the fear accompanies me everywhere. I negotiate with it and sometimes, it allows me to speak.

I’ve made peace with fear, and learned to tell my desires to women, not so much in spite of it, but rather through working with it. What do I mean by that? Well nowadays, I see fear as a protective parent or older brother, watching over and guiding me, using its strong but gentle hand to steer me away from situations likely to be fruitless. But I didn’t discover until well into adulthood that fear almost never the bad guy, and there are times when it does not restrain me, even around the tallest, thinnest, most attractive women. Sometimes, it allows me to approach. And those situations were the most likely to turn into full-blown, happy relationships; more so than when I chose to ignore it and press on without considering its counsel. Few (if any) times where I defied my fear ever turned out good. In retrospect, I should have listened to it more that I did. It has wisdom and so it knows when the women like me and when they don’t, and it permits me to approach those that do and pushes me away from those who’d rather I fly a kite. I’ve come to understand how that works and I hope you’ll check out future episodes for more details.

Though in my teens, fear kept me away from almost every pretty girl, at times I rose above it and made my interest known. However, usually the very thing happened that I feared: They rejected me and threw in some distain and jeers for good measure. My fear knew what it was talking about when it said, “Stay clear of this one.” Nonetheless, I enjoyed some potent romantic times. A few girls said yes. A few girls, my fear permitted me to seek out.

One case was our tenth grade prom. That date turned out to be perhaps the best romantic date I ever had before or since. I asked this female employee if she’d go with me. When she agreed, I almost fainted with thrill. The date turned out well and even today, I remember most every minute of it. But because I was a minor (sixteen at the time), she wouldn’t go out with me again. And by the time I came of age, she had left the school and I, in this pre-Internet era, could not locate her though I tried.

Besides the prom date, I had a “first love” and it was in eleventh grade that my passion for her really ignited. But for various reasons, anxiety tainted that association because her first love was someone other than me, and, I knew it. Plus, she and I had very different values. I was too young to understand that intellectually, although my conscience got it loud and clear. And so, at least during high school, we never connected romantically; although I daydreamed about her often during class, as I watched her much more than I paid attention to the teacher. She was just so beautiful, and I’m certain I failed a few exams due to focusing too much on her.

She and I had a few encounters. But she’d never come as my date to school activities. True, we’d dance sometimes and she’d let me hold her hand once every several blue moons, though she never squeezed back. She’d allow me to nuzzle her shoulder during a slow dance. But her arms only rested on my shoulders; never drawing me closer. Not in high school anyhow. Once in a while, she’d even come out with me for pizza or movie, at my prompting of course. But she never invited me to go with her anywhere. Any activity where we’d be announced as a couple, she rejected. In fact, I had asked her to our tenth, eleventh, and twelfth grade proms as well as numerous dances and field trips. But she always said no, though she said yes to others. This hurt, and the pains of her repeated,  chronic rejections followed me though many of the early years of my love quest. Let’s just call her   [First Love].   She really was that and to me, because   [First Love]   always came first. I would have taken her to the tenth grade prom. But I took the employee instead, since   [First Love]   rejected me. Nowadays, I don’t see the employee lady as second best even though she was not my first choice, because I ended up falling in love with her afterwards, once I realized just how memorable that prom date was. Still though, my feelings for   [First Love]   never wavered and I would continue chasing her for many years; long after the employee departed, and long after high school ended.

Of course I did more than just quest for a girlfriend as a student. I enjoyed repairing electronic devices and dabbling in amateur radio; I loved anything electronic. Additionally, I worked several little jobs as a teen, which included a kitchen helper, a telephone switchboard operator, and receptionist. I sold Christmas trees each December to raise funds for the school, and I played music at our dances. I also managed the school radio station and interned at KDKA radio in 12th grade. These jobs made me feel important and confident, and this I thought, gave me a leg up on the competition for girls. Though I loved the fun of this work, I did it to attract more girls as well. The jobs paid money and as I saw it, girls liked money and guys who had it. So anything I could do to make more of it, I did.

Electronics, specifically radio, fascinated me. This was a good thing too because aside from a few friendships, it was the only pursuit that distracted me from feeling sad for not having a girlfriend. I cried often after seeing girls I wanted hanging out with men I deemed beneath me. Yet those girls avoided me like I was beneath them! They seemed to view me as badly as I did their loser boyfriends. They saw me as the loser, and those losers as winners. Go figure. I didn’t get it. How they could want those cads and not me? I thought this was because I appeared ugly to them. Indeed, some of them said this to me. But over all, I didn’t believe them. So, I kept pressing for a good date. True, I got frustrated often for not finding good ones. But never did I consider my looks a curse, nor did I obsess over them.

I rarely used cologne or dressed up, and did little to enhance my appearance beyond the daily bathing, shaving, nail cutting, hair grooming, teeth brushing, and wearing clean clothes and deodorant. I was secure about my looks even though some said I was plain and unappealing. I never wore designer clothes, gold necklaces, or name brand shoes because I was fine and whole without them. Indeed, as I looked in the mirror to straighten my hair, I liked the guy looking back. He was reasonably handsome with much going for him, and he should be able to attract the girls he liked. Yet in high school, no girl ever desired him back. They laughed as he passed or scurried away on the street as they walked arm-in-arm with their thuggish boyfriends; those guys with the rap sheets that terrorized us civilized folk. The girls preferred these “bad boys” to him. To me: me who never had a police record; me, who got drunk only seven times in high school; me, who never beat up anyone; me, who had better grades; and me who had the promise of a good career in electronics. All these good things that I had, those losers did not. So what did they have that drove the girls wild? With all the jobs and good performing I was doing, I thought I should have been more attractive than the losers. But the girls disagreed. The fact that I wasn’t confounded and confused me, and I’d spend many an hour pondering why this was so through the rest of my love quest.

My powerlessness to answer led me through years of depression, which stretched way beyond high school, and sometimes, affects me to this very day. But as I entered adulthood, electronics kept me sane and made all this bearable. It gave me something besides dating to focus on. While studying, I could forget the nasty looks and words from pretty girls. So, I continued studying radio and TV repair into the mid 80s.

In fact, upon my 1979 graduation, I attended trade school for two years. There as well as at the school for blind children, I only saw a few ladies at Connelley that I liked, but more than in high school. There weren’t many female students in the electronics classes, although the school taught other subjects that drew more just down the hall. Still, I was too scared to approach any ladies. I liked one woman in my advanced electronics class. As usual though, I was too afraid to tell her. But she figured it out after catching me watching her a few times. Flattered she was, but not interested in dating me. So while I did well in trade school scholastically, I had still made no love connections. No matter though because two months after graduation in 1981, I was onto my next adventure; my first full-time job.

In August, I got a temporary job as an electronics technician, also in Pittsburgh. The first few months were hectic because I had no direct supervisor to teach me about the equipment I’d be repairing. There was no senior technician because that fellow had taken ill some months earlier. With him gone, his office soon filed up with hundreds of broken audio visual devices. So once that pile got real big, they felt compelled to bring in someone temporary to repair some it. So they hired me.

I was all alone with this mountain of malfunctioning projectors, TV monitors, and video cassette recorders. My mission: To fix it all. It was nice though, because no one pressured me. They understood that I, fresh from trade school and the only technician there, was in way over my head. Soon however, I could repair three to six items per day once I learned how things worked and how to order parts. Fortunately, most projects were simple — such as frayed power cords, broken belts, missing knobs, and burned out lights. Yet, there was much to do, simple though it was.

As in trade school, again I feared failing and so, spent many extra hours at the office and took home manuals to read over the weekends. I so wanted not to screw it up. Thus until the senior technician returned, I didn’t have time to think about women. I was all about the job at that point.

But ten weeks after I started, the boss man returned. I thought that I’d be laid off. However, the directors liked my work so much that they voted to keep me on to assist, until we finished fixing that massive pile of equipment. With two guys working, it soon disappeared. Then, they asked me to stay for over a year more, and I soon realized that I didn’t have to work so hard to please them. So I had time to resume my love quest, and resume it I did.

Four ladies at work caught my eye. I was still too afraid to say to ladies that I liked them directly. So I’d let them know by just hanging around them until they got it. Then, either they’d pull me aside and say that they knew I was interested and that they’d love to go out (which never happened at that job). Or they’d say sadly that they already had boyfriends and that, while they’d love to go out, they couldn’t. This always happened. I wrung out all four ladies this way, and you guessed it. None were available. So, with no one there left to pursue, that familiar ache of loneliness soon came back again. The excitement of the new job along with the hope of meeting a special lady there was gone.

To cope, I sought religion. Perhaps while following this story, you’ve wondered about my religious background. So let me say that I am neither religious nor spiritual these days. Though raised Catholic, as I matured, believing in things through sheer faith became impossible; especially once my beloved and devout grandmother passed away in 1980. I’ve always been a terrible follower, and so believed in nothing in my early twenties, simply because another said I should. I’m a concrete guy, and so, must sense it for myself to believe it with conviction. However, all of that notwithstanding, as a young adult I attended church often. In 1982, church was good. The people welcomed me and that felt nice. But it was just a distraction, for it left my heart still empty once the services were over. I enjoyed that temporary respite though, because anything (even church) was better than sitting at home on a pretty Sunday morning, alone, with nothing to do. With each passing year, I grew less and less spiritual. But it would be fourteen more years until I completely dismissed the church as a useful means to feel less lonely for having no lovers.

My interest in church came in spits and spurts. So after several months, church lost its appeal as this particular spurt came to an end. I knew that I’d probably not meet my lady there because all of them seemed to believe more strongly than I in God. The whole speaking-in-tongues thing and the faith-healing was just plain crazy to me, and so I could not respect women who believed so strongly without proof. Blind Faith and I never got along, and so I felt guilty attending. Parishioners questioned me about why I was going and suggested I stop until I “saw the light.” So I did stop going regularly in late 1982 once I realized that love questing in church would probably be a fruitless endeavor.

Currently, I’m agnostic – neither believing nor disbelieving in God. He may be out there. He may not. I can’t prove it either way; nor can anyone else for that matter. That’s good enough for me, but not so for women at large who generally believe in a greater entity that regulates their lives and helps them succeed when they follow his rules. They call me a humanist and one even said that I was a son of the devil and kept her children away from me, fearing that I’d corrupt their views about heaven and hell and how God wants us to serve him. I fear not the possibility of no life after death as they do. I’m fully prepared to embrace this if it turns out that way. But without strong faith and hope in a life hereafter, the love quest got harder; not because God was thwarting me, but because the women I encountered looked down on me for questioning. Staying true to my beliefs has cost me dearly in my love quest.

Long ago, I stopped arguing religion. Nonetheless, when I was a stronger believer in the 70s and early 80s, I spent hours a week praying to God, asking him to brighten my dark heart, and bring the woman of my dreams to me. Well, he never did, even after two decades of praying. Indeed I’ve done better in my search by myself, once I stopped believing that he’d do it for me. God was not going to win my love quest for me. No, if this would ever happen, I’d have to do it myself.

But I digress. So let me get back to my job.

Eighteen months into the job, in the spring of 1983, I realized that I could not earn the money I wanted fixing home entertainment devices. Nor had I found a true love at Pitt. It didn’t look like I would either, for I had quickly run through all the women in mine and surrounding departments. Like I said, none would date me. Though I made my own money, aloneness still followed me everywhere. Thus far, the women weren’t impressed with my achievements, hard to achieve as they were, and successful as I was at achieving them.

So when that tech position ended, I went in a new direction; to college for computer programming, a career that promised a higher wage, and would bring more desirable ladies to me, which it eventually did. But during the first two years, I made only three new friends because I was a bookworm. As usual, I was terribly afraid of failing, and since I’d been out of high school for nearly five years, rusty in my reading and writing skills too. So, besides the usual college level work, I also had to relearn many of those forgotten skills. This left little time for socializing between 1984 and 1986, as I spent most every hour outside of class studying. Even the summers were full in those days, as I took my Calculus courses during the first two summers, computer classes in 1986, and a writing class in 1987. Actually, I’m glad I didn’t meet a lady then, because I’d have surely flunked out. There wouldn’t have been time for managing both an education and a relationship although occasional sex without strings was nice.

I longed for my dream girl just the same. So much so, that I visited my first psychotherapist in the fall of 1986. For nine months, we met each week, and though I couldn’t put my finger on any particular insights I got, I did start feeling better about being alone, and less afraid to talk to college women. At times in therapy, I just wanted to get rid of the desire for women rather than satisfy it. No doubt you’re wondering, “How could you want something, and then wish that you didn’t?” Well, at this time the rewards in my love quest were so few, and the disappointment so great, that the longing had become painful, leading me into many humiliating situations and leaving me feeling ashamed. Often women reacted so negatively when I showed them interest that I began feeling that my desires were wrong. At 25 years of age, I believed that though the world was full of beautiful women, none would ever think me beautiful.

Now a few women agreed to date me. So I could attract some, but not those I really desired. I was so disenchanted with the love quest by then, that I’d have been relieved to find that why hadn’t yet found Her was simply because no such person existed. At least that way, my aloneness could not be my fault. That would have been easier to swallow than the idea that there might be some correctable thing wrong with me that was keeping them away.

The therapist listened patiently, offering a consoling voice. I liked discussing the love quest with someone who understood my pains of loneliness and the dilemmas of how to satisfy it. But he refused to assure me that She was just a figment of my imagination. He also assured me profusely that I was not defective in any way, even with my low vision. He thought that She was out there and that I just had to find her. He thought I was fine and that if I was going to ever find Her, I’d have to search harder and smarter. I’ll tell you how I did these things in upcoming episodes.

Therapy encouraged me to intensify my love quest efforts, though I left it with more questions than I had going in. I don’t know how. But even with those questions unanswered, I was, while not cured, markedly better. Maybe it was the therapist’s cheering me on or his unwavering confidence in me. I’m not sure. But I felt more confident asking ladies out. I had achieved the objective of that therapy, which was to get more women into my life. That therapy gave me a big push that got me very far along the journey of my love quest.

Meanwhile back at college, I also improved at the coursework, which meant that I could study less. So in the fall of 1986, I joined a computer users group of sixty students. We sent email back and fourth, and met each other for meals between classes. At night we partied, and so I drank back then, quite a bit. I was known for carrying this round black bottle that had the words “Get Bombed” printed in white letters on the side. I’d fill it with a quart of Jim Beam whiskey and take to many a gathering. In fact, this flask looked like a bomb and the girls seemed charmed by my tipsy displays as I held onto it. I did make a couple close female friends from all that. Yet this life style was not quite what I was after. I wanted them to like me for the sober me; not the intoxicated version. But thinking that I’d have to sacrifice my values a little to get what I wanted, I went along with the drinking for a good while. I attended all sorts of college parties, visited bars, dances, festivals, and hung around the student union, looking for ladies who would come to my bed and please me.

But, with my collegiate education nearly complete, I thought I might have to leave Pittsburgh for a job. So, I avoided serious relationships, though I ached for one. I knew that if I found it, that it would only be temporary. But I didn’t care. Anything would be better than nothing, even a one-night stand. Also, the ladies I met, while very nice, either did not attract me or vice versa. Yes, that same problem once more. I always seemed to interest the ones I didn’t care about. Nonetheless, I made lots of lady friends; a real change from life before college. So while college didn’t drop a dream girl in my lap, it, along with therapy, moved me closer to Her, for I had more female friends and was asking more of them out than ever before. The odds of finding Her thus, had improved much.

While I asked more for dates than ever before in a given year, I also got more love rejections. In a way, this was also rewarding. Rejections were better than nothing at all, as they proved that I had begun to master my fear of approaching ladies. The more rejections I got I reasoned the less afraid of ladies I must be. So the chronic rejections themselves became a measure of success in my love quest. At least now, I was hunting, trying different approaches, and acquiring the emotional scars to show it. So at last, in college, I finally managed to break out of my shell.

I finished school in 1988, with a Bachelors degree in Computer Science along with a minor in mathematics from the University of Pittsburgh; the same place I’d worked some five years earlier. From there, I went on to spend fifteen years, working as a software engineer for a fortune 500 company.

My hope that the computer field would bring more women into my life came true. Indeed, during my first two years, I met hundreds of women; more than in my entire adult life prior. Now that I had more money than ever, I could afford to try dating services, attend weekend-getaways, and go to dances and meetings with singles groups. I signed up for my first dating service immediately after cashing my first big paycheck. I then applied for a second one a year later.

Then in 1992, I bought a nice home after a few sweet raises. This, I thought, would surely impress the ladies and I was certain that only a little more time stood between me and my dream girl, who would, at any moment, waltz right in and complete my life. In fact, I bought an extra-large refrigerator, reserved space for her things in my bedroom alongside my king sized waterbed, and saved a spot in the garage for her car.

One day in 1994, a neighbor called as I was sealing my back deck, and invited me to his church. Eager to bond with my new neighbors, I forgot about why I had abandoned church in 1982, and I went with him, just to check it out. To my surprise, I found lots of eligible women. But soon, just as had happened some twelve years earlier, II quickly grew bored with it. I was no more a believer in 1994 than I had been in 1982. The truth was, I wasn’t there to worship. Instead, I went to meet women. That was it, and they knew it quickly. Once again, none would go out with me. Another strategy tried in the love quest, and another one failed.

Meanwhile, at work, I asked over a hundred ladies for dates, hoping that now that I was in my own home, they’d surely say yes. I invited them for lunch and hosted a couple team-building sessions and parties, so that all would see how well I was doing and appreciate how good a provider I could be. They came, they complimented me, and some stayed a couple hours. They liked my house and how well I kept it. But in the end, like my latest church stint, the big house and good salary never won any hearts. So no one ever parked her car in my garage. No one ever put her underwear in those empty drawers in my bedroom. No one ever brought any food to keep in my refrigerator for her next visit. I had instead, this cold draft that I felt against my face every night I ascended the steps to the second-floor master bedroom; a daily reminder that no one was up there waiting for me, and that no one I’d met so far wanted to be up there. So, after four years, with my dressers, garage, refrigerator, and heart still empty, I came to the conclusion that once again, a big change would be necessary to move me ahead in my love quest. I could not turn that great house into a wonderful home full of love thought I put every spare hour I had into the quest. I began feeling tethered to that house and soon, came to hate it there.

So in 1996, in that final year in the house, I came to look forward to Mondays and dread Fridays while my coworkers felt the opposite. They couldn’t wait for Fridays but hated Mondays. Why was I so different? Because I knew that come Friday, I’d likely spend the entire weekend alone, and that come Monday, I’d at least have people around me again when the new work week began. The loneliness burned in my heart. Career-wise I’d come so far. But socially, I ached as much as ever for sustained eroticism, and love.

As fate had it, I discovered Philadelphia, a city with way more single women. Some friends from there invited me to visit. So in December, 1996 I went, and loved it from the minute I arrived. Pretty ladies adorned every city block downtown. Plus, with the extensive public transportation, I could get to the social spots much easier than where I was currently living in Ohio. So, it didn’t take long to decide to sell my house and move there.

The Philly move turned out to be another big step forward in the love quest. For the first time, I could access thousands of women easily, without transportation worries. So I made friends, went to bars, boat trips, restaurants, skating parties, a trip to New York City, and any event I could to place myself among potential mates. One day even, I had two dates; one in the afternoon, and one that night. Each weekend, I’d pick a spot in the city, and then learn how to get there on the bus or train, and then go there, striking up conversations with beautiful strangers along the way. The thrill of learning a new city kept me from feeling too lonely, for the first year at least.

But after three plus years there, and only a few delightful but short-lived relationships (Cathy, Violet, Carol, Joyce, Karen, [Vee],   [Lynn],   [Tina],   Joanna), I was still alone. Now I did meet more women per year in Philly than in any other place prior, and I did have a few wonderful erotic encounters. During my last year there in 2001, I asked at least a thousand women to dance, and also launched numerous campaigns on the online and telephone dating services, where I contacted thousands more. I approached more women than ever that year. However, all but ten rejected me flat. And of those that agreed to meet me, only four wanted a second date. And of those romances, none lasted longer than a few months and all but one fizzled after just a few weeks. So while the move to Philly provided the target-rich environments I sought to move further in my quest, I left there in December of 2001 empty-handed, unfulfilled, and extremely disappointed. I was fresh out of ideas of what to try next and didn’t even want to try anymore.

This love quest had by this time cost me lots of money too! There was the move from Ohio, the loss of money when I sold the house, and all the household stuff I had to just about give away so I could downsize from that four-bedroom, two-story house with a double garage, to a two-bedroom apartment in a high rise building. Also in Philadelphia, the quest cost the most as I paid for most all my dates as well as my own drinks and transportation to the various hot spots around town. My desire for companionship was strong as ever, but after three decades, I still had no idea how to get it. I felt I had to do something radical but wasn’t sure what. But then, fate laid another clue in my path.

During my last year in Philly, I started having problems at work. The job was getting harder, I received no raises my last two years there. To add insult to injury, I still had not found my dream girl after thirteen years of building that career and the wealth that went with it. That’s when I surmised that corporate life was not for me anymore. All the hard work and extra hours to build a happy, successful life had not paid off though I had done everything a fellow was supposed to do to succeed. I got educated, held a good job for a long time, and set up several great living quarters. Unfortunately, ladies never lingered, if they even came at all.

I grew weary of the increasing pressures to step up my work performance. While I liked the raises and promotions which were more plentiful during the 90s, I found the rewards emptier and harder to get, the higher in the company I got. Working harder just didn’t make sense eventually, since all I had when I turned off the computer was an empty, cold dwelling. My place.

So the question occurred: Why fight so for a career whenever only cold rooms, a quiet kitchen, and an empty bed were my reward each night? I couldn’t answer this except to say that I shouldn’t. I understood that I couldn’t fix whatever was keeping her away, while working myself to death as a senior software engineer. I also knew that finding her was more important than anything, including making lots of money as a corporate big shot. Life was marching on too, as I was already well into my forties without having solved my happiness problem. So I promised myself in the summer of 2001 to either find my dream girl or die trying. If that meant devoting full time to the quest, then that’s what I would do.

It would be some months before I appreciated fully what that promise meant. But I knew right off that I’d have to free up lots of time to work on me. I would need to quit my job and learn once more how to live cheaply, at least until I found Her. But I agonized over doing this because the job treated me better financially than I could do on my own; guaranteeing me a spot among the middle class as long as I kept working. Plus, after reading hundreds of thousands of ladies’ profiles on the dating sites, it was clear that lots of women find richer men more attractive than those with modest incomes. So quitting would exclude me from consideration by many attractive women and thus, set me way back in my love quest. These and other truths made leaving one of the toughest choices I’ve ever made.

I suspected that I’d never find another position that paid as well; at least not initially. But so what? What good was the money if I wasn’t happy? Money had not made me happy to date. In fact, the joy of having it did not counterbalance the hardship of earning it. In the end, I was indeed worse for the wear.

True. The job qualified me for, and surrounded me with, lots of women. But simply being among ladies and having lots of money in my pocket and a nice suburban home was not enough. While the job exposed me to more women, the fact that I had it did not interest the ladies, any more than did my previous endeavors. They still saw me as, at best, too plain, and at worst, too ugly to date. The job with all its trimmings therefore, did not end this now-monotonous love quest.

Plus, and most sadly, women still looked down their noses at me, the same as they had twenty-five years earlier in high school. The fact that I was now earning close to ninety thousand dollars a year didn’t matter. The results of my approaches had remained essentially the same as it was in my teens. Zilch. I was still as lonely as I’d been in the 70s, yet still just as eager to win at love. Working so hard at a career just hadn’t gotten me where I thought it should, and I was ready to give it up in order to try something different.

So, in late 2001 I began preparing to resign: I saved money, moved back home with Mom, fixed up her house while I still had my software engineer’s salary, and spent thousands of hours journaling and mentally turning myself inside out. I looked for ways to change for the better, all the while seeking tools I could use to finally end my love quest victoriously.

This effort became my full-time job. Everything else, including my real job became a distraction. I substituted self-help books about relationships and dating for computer and software manuals. In the evening, time that I’d normally spend working extra hours on some programming project, I instead spent trolling the Internet for ideas and dates. My day job had become second priority, especially after business hours. Imagine that!

Now I’d planned to keep working for three years once I knew that I’d be leaving. But as the first of those years progressed, the job changed into an irritating distraction from my true purpose. That purpose, which I now understood since making the promise to myself in 2001, was to finally win the love quest. I wanted to really give the quest my all.

Though I had given up the extra hours, I was still putting too much time into the job, and too little into finding fulfillment in love. Not only did I wish to spend my evenings and weekends working the quest, but wanted to throw in the forty regular weekly work hours as well. As usual, the loneliness which had been with me since the age of twelve continued pounding at my soul, and I was getting really tired of it, and more eager than ever to find relief. From my history of many things tried and many things failed, I figured that I wouldn’t silence its doleful voice unless I could fully focus on it – something I’d never really done before. What else could I do?
It seemed like I’d done everything else. Let’s see. As I mentioned earlier, I:
• Acquired a good self image,
• Reduced my teenage fears of talking to women.
• Held jobs all through grade school and high school,
• Stayed out of serious trouble,
• Successfully completed high school and trade school,
• Held an electronics technician job for nearly two years,
• Completed psychotherapy,
• Joined the computer users group in college,
• Successfully completed college,
• Got a good job,
• Owned a nice home,
• Learned how to maintain a home,
• Attended singles groups and churches,
• Approached more than ten thousand women,
• Achieved a respected status at work,
• Earned close to ninety thousand dollars a year at the end,
• Which enabled me to give a lady a very good time,
• I avoided drugs and immoral behavior,
• I was stable and kind,
• Threw myself into lots of new environments and cultures throughout the quest so I might find the best areas in which to search.

But the one thing I hadn’t done so far was to completely devote my entire life to the pursuit. Up to this point, the love quest had always been more of a hobby; one that I worked during weekends and sometimes on weeknights. I’d never really gone at it full tilt before. Yet I knew that I would never be as happy as I could be unless I could find Her, and I was convinced that the way to do that the most effectively, was to sink every last waking hour into the search and into fixing myself.

So it came about some fifteen months after I began executing my plan to resign, that I did indeed quit. Was this too early? Perhaps. True. I didn’t make it to the end of 2004 as in the plan. I actually resigned in March of 2003. Nonetheless, I managed to pay off all debts and finish all the maintenance projects on Mom’s home too. I cancelled any magazine and music subscriptions I no longer needed, hauled away a ton of junk, and began saving coupons. This resignation was a pivotal moment in my love quest, and I’ll discuss more about this difficult choice in future episodes as well as what happened subsequently.

An all-time approach to this problem (as opposed to a full-time or part-time approach) proved to be grueling. So I devised a few diversions. One was part time DJing. Others included writing, computer repair, reading a lot, buying and selling on eBay, and watching classic movies. I enjoy watching Dr. Phil McGraw and Dr. Joy Browne as well, as my philosophies generally align with theirs. I’ve written numerous articles and stories which are, as of yet, unpublished. But they will be, in this blog and podcast. I’ll share some of my best works, which center on the quest. In fact, most of them do actually. Also, as in high school, I still enjoy ham radio, and hold an extra class Amateur Radio license (my call sign is N8UBU). Also, I got certified by Microsoft as an expert on various versions of their Windows operating system. Nowadays, I’m butler and caregiver for my Mom, who is recovering from open-heart surgery. I just finished re-plumbing her house last March and installing a wooden banister alongside the bridge from the parking lot into the side walk, so she has something to hold on to when entering. I do keep busy, which is one way of reducing the feelings of emptiness I discussed earlier. It’s not a cure. But it is good, temporary relief.

Perhaps my love quest talks will sound humanist or Buddhist in that they encourage us to tap our own inner strengths rather than looking to greater, outside, and improvable forces. This is my mantra now and it is an essential premise in my philosophy throughout the love quest. This should help clarify why I chose as I have as well as why I’ve tried doing much of it myself.

Through no other force than my own hard work and lady luck, I think I’ve found Her. But I’m not sure. I’ve enjoyed a wonderful relationship with [Emmy] for going on six years now, and prefer this association far over being alone. We get along quite well; we’re lucky if we fight once a year, and even then, we never yell at each other. We always maintain respect for each other and never go to bed mad. Although we have problems sexually that we’re working on currently, [Emmy] is among the most caring and understanding woman I’ve known. I have 95% of the relationship I’ve sought, and feel that once we work out the issues of eroticism, I’ll officially be able to end my love quest.

So since I’ve not yet actually won the love quest, I admit that I’m no expert. So while you’ll see many success stories here, you’ll see much sadness and despair as well. Indeed, the bulk of my experiences have been sad, sorry to say. For every one hour of joy I’ve experienced in my quest, I’ve probably had a hundred hours of pain and disappointment. In my search, sorrow has been a big part of the reality. Many have suggested that I express more of the joys than the sorrows. But to preserve the truest essence of my quest, I must relate completely my sad times because as painful as they were, they made it possible for me to have the good times that I do now. So I’d trade none of those sorrowful years away.

Not all the stories are sad. There are many pleasant ones. I’ll tell you about my introspections and the changes to my philosophy and approach to the problem that enabled me to reduce depression. In short, I’ll let you know how I learned to cope with being alone. Merely coping however is not ideal. So I’ve not given up. I hope through this blogcast that I can persuade those of you who have abandoned your search, to keep trying. In 2001, I declared that I would either win at this game, or die trying. You’ll need this same resolve if you’re ever going to experience true happiness, and I hope that through sharing my experiences and insights, that they’ll help you find the resolve to press on yourself.

I am no psychologist and have little formal training in this subject. My writings come not from any large-scale clinical studies or other systemic techniques for deducing human behavior. They come however, from my own three plus decades of experience chasing “the perfect woman”. So any advice I give should be considered no more than inspirational, and is not intended to replace bona fide professional help. This blog is for informational and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as anything other than me, telling my story of my love quest.

What is “the perfect woman,” you ask? Well, stick around and I’ll tell you about my vision of her. But not now. However, I will tease you and say that the word “perfect” here does not mean absolutely without flaws. More on that in future episodes, along with much more about the struggle to find perfection and the many strategies I’ve tried, to get it.

So thanks very much for stopping by and I hope you’ll visit again soon. There’s lots more to say.

Tom Hesley
http://tomhesley.com/

Victorious Romantic Love Rejections

Tuesday, October 25th, 2005

Dear [Mentat],

Yes, I still believe that the more we approach, the greater our chances of finding a true love become. However, when I adopted this overly simple strategy in 1990, I was surprised to encounter such a high percentage of   romantic rejections. I mean, many dating books advise men to expect just one out of every one-hundred women to respond favorably. But with me, that hits-to-misses ratio was more like one out of every fifteen hundred. No joke!

Plus, I’d underestimated the cumulative negative impacts of too frequent rejection on my psyche.  Through all that, I came to understand that I was taking the romantic rejections too personally. Back then, rejection affected me as would a punch in the face, sending me reeling for weeks sometimes. I came to detest it as well as the women who issued it. The more   love rejections   I received, the more hurt I got and the more afraid of rejection I grew. 

So I had to bow out of the game for a year or so in the mid 1990s to learn to desensitize myself. To that end, I entered therapy, read several books on coping with love rejection, and tried to savor life without women for a while. The therapy proved a success, though of course, I still don’t like rejection. But today, the female utterance of the word No, doesn’t produce the searing anxiety it used to. I don’t feel as slighted anymore, because I understand that ladies are as powerless to control who turns them on as I, and so could not be rightly blamed for finding me wanting.  See    here    for more details on some of the potentially harmful effects of romantic rejection that I’ve encountered through the years. 

It’s bad to seek rejection just for rejection’s sake because one needs to have an eye toward any wisdom the experience might contain; wisdom that’s easy to miss if all you’re worried out is bumping up the numbers. At times, I lost sight of the real goal (a beautiful lady saying yes), and actually felt a sense of accomplishment when I got a no. I reasoned that the love rejections were evidence that at least I was getting out and trying, rather than sitting on my butt at home doing nothing at all. This was certainly true enough. After all, I wouldn’t have accrued the rejections by sitting around at home. In a sense, the rejections were indeed strong evidence that I was at least playing the game. No, I wasn’t   winning   the game. But since one must first   play   the game in order to win, I found comfort in knowing that I was one step closer to winning, by playing, and accruing the romantic rejections.

This worked for a year or two. My pride in my monumental efforts to defy my fear helped offset the humiliations I encountered. It didn’t matter whether she said no or yes. Success at that point I measured by how often I could bring myself to ask, irrespective of how she responded. But soon, that sweet part of the bitter-sweet taste of rejection disappeared. No longer was it good enough just to get out there. No longer was I proud of being able to work up the courage to ask a woman to dance. And finally, no longer did I feel any sense of accomplishment by having gotten far enough to be told No. Getting rejections thus became child’s play. And then, once the thrill of victory over successfully making the attempt faded, only the humiliation remained. Thus, sustaining the motivation to keep trying grew difficult, particularly once I moved here to Altoona in late 2001. Even today, it’s not [so much] the fear of being rejected that keeps me from approaching more women. Rather, it’s the resignation that they’ll just say no anyway, so why bother?

Romantic rejection is all the more embarrassing when one realizes that he could have gotten the same information without risking so much. Why jump head first into a pond to see how warm it is, when you could have just stuck your toe in and learned the same? Throughout the 1990s, I dismissed the validity of non verbal communication. For me, the toe test was insufficient and potentially inaccurate. It wasn’t good enough thus, for a woman to just give me a dirty look as I walked toward her. Simply looking at her and observing her reaction did not absolve my responsibility to genuinely move past my fear, and actually talk with her. Just reading her body language didn’t count. No. I expected myself to actually   ask   her if she’d care to get acquainted. Of course, by this time in the typical scenario, she had already answered that several times with dirty looks, by moving away, and such, and was clearly frustrated that I paid no mind. So, not only did I get rejected, I also got many judgmental stares along with disparaging comments and unfavorable epithets. In this way, the bite of romantic rejection felt much more painful than it might have, had I acted smarter and with more sensitivity.

To wrap this up then, the   costs   of focusing only on increasing the numbers of women approached and rejections received, and not enough on improving the approach techniques, would be:

  1. Too much wasted time and excessively hurt feelings.  Why ask a lady out when you’re virtually certain that she’ll say no anyhow? 
  2. Needlessly frequent and severe rejections.   It’s one thing to simply be told no. That’s humiliating enough.  But it’s quite another (and more painful thing) to be told no with the added message that she thinks you’re a fool, particularly when you have indeed acted like one.
  3. Loss of one’s good reputation. Asking the same woman out too often can make you into a stalker in her eyes as well as her friends’.  When numbers are the only game, we often forget who we’ve already approached, particularly when approaching hundreds of women in a night Women talk crassly about insensitive men, who appear to be on the make.
  4. Missed opportunities to learn from rejection. If you don’t consider what happened and learn from it, you’ll be no more likely to get a Yes the next time. And who wants to keep repeating the same mistake? Take gamblers for example. They’re never content to just sit back and play the game. They’re constantly looking for ways to improve their odds of winning. The man seeking a mate should also be forever on the look-out for new angles.
  5. Wasted resources   such as needless money spending. Often, guys buy ladies drinks and other gifts, even when they strongly suspect that she doesn’t like them. Yet they do so hoping to   melt her heart.   What a waste however. While such strategies might work on the so-called gold-digging lady, they will not on any woman whose only agenda item is to exchange love with a desirable man.
  6. Less time for other pursuits. If one’s constantly out in the bars working the numbers, he’ll miss out on other, perhaps more enjoyable pastimes. To me in the 1990s, bars were a necessary evil one had to endure in order to meet women. I didn’t like them, but couldn’t think of any other places where so many available and desirable women congregated, and thus where my chances of finding a lover would be higher. I would have much rather spent that time attending ham radio club meetings, shopping for CDs and books, and tinkering with computers. However, these activities weren’t often frequented by sought-after women. Yet now that I’m aware of the futility of meeting someone in a bar, not to mention the fact that I don’t drink anymore, I find these days that I make very much more time for hobbies than ten years ago.
  7. Too many dead-end relationships. When all we care about are the numbers, it’s easy to become entangled in a relationship with a lady who isn’t   the best.   That is to say, that without careful prior consideration of the woman’s desirability, we can end up approaching ladies who look great from afar but cease looking so good as we move closer. I’ve on occasion glanced women across the room that seemed perfect. Then I rushed over (before someone else would snag them) for a dance. Sometimes they’d say yes and next thing I knew, I’d be on the dance floor looking at her before me and wondering where her charm had gone that had been so plain but a few moments ago.

 

From the preceding list, it’s easy to glean the many practical advantages of working smarter while targeting more than just raising the sheer numbers of approaches:

  1. Better Overall Mood. Less shame, less depression, less wasted time chasing relationships doomed to failure from the start, more liked in one’s social group, and more time to pursue fun hobbies.
  2. Less Need for Therapy. This grows from item 1.
  3. Improved Self Confidence and Self Esteem   due to less squandering of the self on needless rejections.
  4. Improved chances of finding Miss Right. If one is not consumed in the wasteful efforts of needless repeated rejections and dead-end relationships, he can aim his resources where they’ll count more, and only subject himself to rejection from truly eligible women.
  5. Fewer Wasted Resources. Follows from item 4 above.
  6. Better Reputation. With a better ability to   read the situation,   a man is less likely to make unwelcome advances in which he goes needlessly too far. Women like knowing a guy is sensitive to their wishes, and will talk well of he who heeds them to others, even if they don’t consider him attractive.
  7. More Time and Energy For Other Pursuits.   Questing for the right relationship can be exhausting because not only does it take considerable time and effort to troll for girls, but the chronic rejections make the search doubly taxing. If a man is working smarter, and is thus presumably getting fewer rejections, this would seem to bias his overall experience in the quest to the positive and thus make it less draining on his psyche.
  8. Better Effectiveness in Work and Career.  With fewer rejections, and a resulting better overall mood as mentioned in item 1, the man would concentrate better, be less irritable, and thus, do a better job at work. As a result, his coworkers would like and respect him more and likely push for promotions for him where applicable. This in turn would give him more resources (buying power), and as you know, women prefer richer men, even the ones who can’t accurately be typed as gold diggers.
  9. Longer Lasting, Happier Relationships. If a man selects more eligible mates to begin with, he’ll be happier with his choices for longer periods. While it’s true that he won’t have as many dates since he’s choosier, those that do present themselves will be more completely fulfilling. As a result, he’ll
    A. Treat them better,
    B. Respect them more,
    C. Be less given to abusing them, and
    D. Be better able to accommodate any unusual proclivities in them.
    In short, he’ll be better equipped to accept them as they are and thus, won’t as likely seek to change them. Potential friction shrinks therefore, and the lady will feel more genuinely loved (because she would in fact be).
  10. Enhanced Desirability. Given items 1, 3, 6, and 8 above, the man would be deemed more attractive, and so his chances of attracting the lady of his dreams would go up.

 

There, does that answer your question?

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

The Fallacy Of Hero Worship

Friday, September 23rd, 2005

Dear [Mentat],

See my   Tom’s Views –> Self Actualization – A Strictly Internal Affair   piece for more details about Maslow’s   self-actualization   concept.

But if we accept [Abraham Maslow's] needs hierarchy [triangle] as gospel, the state of self-actualization, that does not rely much at all on others,  might only be reached once the basic needs we have that   do   depend on the whims of other people, are gratified.   The ruler, to be a good one, must first be ruled himself.   Though once a ruler, he might despisehis earlier life and look down on others still living that life, the fact remains that he had to live as a peasant himself to pavethe way to regal status. Likewise, the person wanting his own business must first, typically, work for others. He might not like that, and would probably consider such work degrading. But that lower work, much as he hated it, must be done in order for him to successfully run his business.

It seems crazy that such a successful person would spurn the path he took through the lower level needs to get where he is. Yet Maslow says that it’s common for people once gratified at a particular level, to   start underestimating   the importance of the gratifier at that level. In my view, we must not make this mistake, lest we become hypocrites. How can we legitimately diminish someone for living as we ourselves once lived? More on this next.

Are level five doers truly more worthy of our esteem? Do they represent the gold standard of humanity, and are the lower doers lacking who don’t measure up? Shall we blame the love-seekers for exhibiting needs not visible in the self-actualizers? And as a result, should we say, “You should be more like them”? Are the lower-level needs more shameful than level five ones? Are self-actualizers inherently   better   people?

Do they in fact, make the best lovers? After all, self-actualizers seem more deeply happy and have a greater zest for life, physical and mental health, longevity, generosity, compassion, patience, and such. Can we rightly attribute these achievements to an entirely self-made prowess? In short, how much credit for their advanced standing do they actually deserve, and do people not so advanced deserve any less? Shall the man who completes the race jeer at those still running it, even though he ran it himself? Shall he whose belly is full look disdainfully upon the hungry in New Orleans as they scurry about and ravage like animals to survive?

We’ve known politicians who, once in office, cancel programs that years earlier made possible their political careers [to take off]. Then on the stump, they deride folks who would take advantage of such programs like college grants, public works, and after-school activities. It’s common for humans to achieve success and then negatively judge those who have not. The higher-ups fault the lower-downs for having needs and inadequacies which they claim they’ve vanquished in themselves, and these attitudes are the basis of most inequality. Sociologists say that inequality is the biggest root of evil among humans and is basic to just about every social problem plaguing us today. Well, what better example of inequality than the stratification resulting from these wrongful claims of higher righteousness by the well-to-do? The hero without humility is no hero. The person [...] thinking that he doesn’t need his origins, is deluded.

Once I had many heroes. I looked up to people   more advanced   than myself and admired them. But I also blamed myself and got depressed because I wasn’t more like them. Then I learned that they were fallible and generally no less susceptible to life’s temptations and hardships than was I. People seeming proper today were likely improper at one time. We must be careful not to conclude that heroes somehow circumvented the customary paths to excellence. They didn’t figure out any other ways of eliminating their basic needs than through sheer gratification. Their way of living is not   better   per se than needier folks, but more precisely, is a logical progression along the same continuum. At best, we might say of their creativespirit and purely expressive abilities that are so universally revered, that they were lucky or privileged, and fortunate to have been able gratify their lower level needs so that they could play at level five. They might not show symptoms of lower level needs today. But I’m certain that practically all of them would, if deprived of gratifiers at those lower levels.

Attributing too much awe to these fully self-actualizing people without a clear understanding of how they came to be that way, has undesirable consequences. Let me explain. As I consider today how my Mom’s parents treated me and others when I knew them, I think that they were among the most self-actualized people I’ve known. They were kind, unconditionally loving, overwhelmingly compassionate, and selfless. Gram only ever complained about her arthritis, when she complained at all. And Pap? He wanted to hold and protect me just like the women in the family. Gram and Pap rarely yelled, and lead very simple, stress-free lives. I believe you met them in the early 70s during a visit here after we brought you home from the bus one Friday night. They lived in this house before Mom and Dad took it over in 1986, and things look much different around here today than in my grandparents’ time. They had far fewer material goods. In fact, the cellar in the 70s was empty except for a washer, dryer, furnace, water heater, pantry cabinet, and a couple empty tables. But now, you can barely walk down there because there’s so much stuff, much of which hasn’t been used in several years. Mom probably has ten loads of laundry thrown about the floors, Christmas decorations from fifteen years ago that haven’t been displayed since, and lots of papers and other memorabilia. Me, I have an empty upright freezer down there, a brand new air compressor which I’ve not hooked up though I bought it in 2002, and boxes and boxes of every sort of tool. As a boy, I could roller-skate in the basement without fear of running into anything. But not today. Back then, the floors had no clutter; no dirty laundry, no tools lying around, and very few infrequently used items at all sat propped against the white-washed walls. Upstairs, every room, dresser, closet, and cabinet was the same — sparse. The grandparents had very little, and apparently, wanted for very little. How could they be happy?

I never thought about this much until after they both died. It so happened that Pap died in 1977 and Gram followed in 1980 while   [First Love]   and I lived together in Highland Park. In fact the morning of July 21st, as Gram exhaled for the last time,   [First Love]   and I had just finished our biggest fight.  [First Love]   spent the entire previous day at [a local amusement park] with a male friend [...], without inviting me — her boyfriend — along. And when she got back, she was notably evasive about all they’d done together. Even today, [his] name still strikes tension in my stomach, for those two had a colorful dating history in high school, and as such, she had this unshakable affection for him. He was rich, drove nice cars, ran his own business — you know, the all-American male success object. Calls to his number [...] appeared on our long distance phone bills throughout the summer. So there was clearly something going on between them, and I hated that, and resented her for going with him despite my pleas that she not. But you know   [First Love].  Never one to acquiesce. He spelled the beginning of the end for us.

The [amusement park] incident reversed the momentum of our relationship. Up to then, we’d been growing closer, but after that collision of wills we started to drift apart. She stepped up her talk of moving into the [...] dorms in the fall, and during August, spent no time in [our apartment] with me, all though officially we lived together through August 31st. She’d begun pulling away and I couldn’t stop it, though I tried often. I fought her at every turn, arguing constantly about how she was allowing [this interloper] to ruin things for us. I accused her of deserting me and blamed her for our demiseas a couple since she after all, she was the one who chose to move out. And then, as if to drive the knife further, she began a new association with [another formidible nemesis].

After she’d gone, I was crushed. What a waste the past seven years of chasing her had become. How could she abandon me after just a few months when I had patiently waited so long for her to love me? It wasn’t fair, and I hated her for it.

[First Love],   so much more well-read than I then, could consistently confute me any time we discussed the situation, leaving me stammering and ashamed of my feelings. I never won an argument with her, and she never admitted to wrongdoing. I just couldn’t understand why, if she loved me as she said, she could so casually move away and why she had so much need of [her park buddy] and [the nemesis]. Yet she felt completely right with them and in moving to [the dorms]. All the blame for “ruining our relationship” as she put it was mine. She painted me as a selfish, needy child who would probably never acquire empathic abilities, and so, would never be able to truly love any woman. She said that her life circumstances demanded much more compassion and understanding than I apparently could provide. Then, she said something that brought Gram and Pap to mind once more, and set me on a thinking path that would prove confusing and mentally debilitating for the next two decades. The day she broke up with me she said, “Tom, I have so many problems right now, that you’ll likely never comprehend. Maybe when you’re sixty you will understand. But it’s obvious that as a nineteen year old, you simply cannot.”

Over the next couple months, I called her often, trying to get her to change her mind, and when I wasn’t campaigning to win her again, I spent much of the rest of the time in my bedroom, staring out the window, crying. It was hard to eat or get excited about going to [the trad school I was attending] which up till then, I loved so much. I’d even called [a therapy place] for help, but when they asked a few uncomfortable questions on the phone, I hung up and didn’t try again. I was an emotional wreck though, and I might well have ended it all if it weren’t for Mom, [Cher], and [Dem] supporting me.

Then, in October, whether by some design or random chance, an image came to mind of my grandparents standing before me. This was a peaceful, familiar vision at first, for they’d always been so consoling during childhood. Why not then, now? So I’d imagine them patting me on the shoulders and saying, “There, there now. You’re going to be all right.” And for a few weeks, that helped calm my chronically upset stomach.

Then, one day in early November as I viewed them in a daydream, I remembered   [First Love's]   words, “…Maybe when you’re sixty, you’ll understand… …Maybe when you’re sixty, you’ll understand… …Maybe when you’re sixty, you’ll understand…” The thought rang and reverberated relentlessly like a favorite song you just can’t stop hearing in your head, mixed with Pap’s voice saying, “There, there now. You’ll be all right.” I felt I was on the verge of some profound insight though at the time, this was just a feeling and I hadn’t the words to express what that insight might be. For some days, the two quotations played again and again on top of each other in my head. They meant something important and I was bound and determined to figure it out.

I came to believe that   [First Love's]   seemingly optimistic prediction that I might understand her when I was much older, was actually a lament that I didn’t understand her already. Clearly, she felt that I   should have   been more sympathetic and often chided me because I wasn’t. So this was just her way, through now-obvious sarcasm, of chiding some more, of expressing her beliefs of my ignorance as being   so   deficient, and my mental growth potential   so   small, that it would indeed take me till I was sixty to correct what she termed as my blind, selfish, unloving, and spoiled ways.

Ironically, the qualities she found so lacking in me, I found so abundant in my grandparents. They never were selfish, always understood (or at least, they acted like they did), loved without reservation, rarely forced me to do anything I wished not to do, and they were older than sixty. Could it be that if I acquired their strengths, that   [First Love]   would come back? After all, they had everything she seemed to want. The problem was that I did not, and eliminating this deficit became a life goal of mine for several years.

My grandparents then changed from my consulars to my heroes. I started appreciating the usefulness of being like them, thinking that if I had been more like them while with   [First Love],   that we never would have broken up. So, all through the eighties until I moved to Ohio, I tried to understand how they behaved, what made people admire them, and then, to emulate them. I believe I considered them more in the first decade after their deaths than during the last two decades that they lived. For some years after our split, all that really mattered to me was getting   [First Love]   back. So I poured and poured over every memory of Mom’s parents and how well they’d treated me, looking for ways to discover [and]incorporate their good qualities into my being. I scrutinized photographs, asked Mom and her sister and family friends to tell me everything about them they knew, and spent hours listening to the few surviving cassette recordings of them. What emerged at first was further affirmation that   [First Love]   had assessed me well. I really was wanting in several areas crucial to the health of any relationship, not just with   [First Love].

I came to believe that I had indeed been selfish, relentless, immature, and spoiled. And with that, my grandparents assumed a judgmental role in my visions, scolding me for how cruelly I had treated   [First Love],  and voicing shame and disappointment because I had not learned better how to truly love someone from them. They were the best examples of good lovers around, had spent so much time raising and teaching me, and yet, I had absorbed so little. I felt ashamed and disappointed too, and resolved once more, to reshape myself in their image.

Now, here’s where I made the mistake mentioned just before starting this story, of attributing too much awe to self-actualizing people. I tried emulating my grandparents’ kindness, but most of the time felt pretentious and insecure doing it. They did it so well, but I just couldn’t manage it with the same grace and sincerity. Compassion came so naturally to them as I remember, because they never had to think about it. They were just automatically kindly folk. This was their talent. It was their nature. But for me, to exude compassion for   [First Love]   was quite a willful and dissonant undertaking. Nothing natural or right-feeling about it. Try as I did, I just couldn’t see her behaviors as veiled cries for compassion. Not when she was doing the following:

· Insisting on frequent time with [her two closest male friends] without me

· Spending only eighteen days at our home throughout the entire three months we lived together with most of those being in June,

· Moving away from our home,

· Distancing herself from me once at [school]

I felt that she was milking me, that she was willfully excluding me from the intimate details of her life that she had so willingly shared before, and that she’d decided well before this that we weren’t really suited for each other. All the compassion and kindness in the world would probably not have affected the outcome. Not really. Delayed it perhaps but not prevented it. She would have left sooner or later, no matter how like my grandparents I was. Of this I was fairly sure.

But on the flip side, maybe it was the depths of my own ignorance, rather than the overwhelming evidence against her, that made me feel so sure that   [First Love]   was doing me wrong by pointing out my perhaps true, but inconsequential flaws. That is, the things she said were wrong with me may indeed have been wrong, but did   not   actually cause her to leave. Yet since I still loved her, I for some time ignored the evidence, and aspired to become more of the person she claimed to want. Becoming more like my grandparents [therefore] became an imperative.

Now I had no idea what I was getting into, and soon found that there was much more to being like [Gram and Pap] than simply emulating their behaviors. When we highly esteem a person, it’s all too easy to dismiss the significance of the journey they took to reach the worthiness of our admiration. I did this. I had no idea what they were like before I was born, but learned that they weren’t always the kindly and gentle people I remembered. In the forties, Pap yelled a lot according to Mom, ranting and raving and cursing and drinking daily. He used to play cards and shoot pool just to make ends meet. He had mob connections, though Mom wasn’t very clear on the details. She may not have known any, or she may have been trying to protect his memory. But she did say that in the early fifties, Gram threatened to leave if he didn’t change. That must have scared him, because mend his ways he did. By the time of my earliest memories of him in 1964, he was completely different and he and Gram were still happily married. He had not been for all of his life, the man I knew him to be.

Gram herself, while perhaps more benevolent than Pap, went through her own growth periods as well, though again, Mom didn’t have much detail of her as an adolescent in the roaring twenties. We do have pictures from when she was fifteen in 1925, and she was quite a beautiful teenage girl. Her beauty and the secure way she carried herself hinted that she’d been around the block a few times, though again, I don’t have specifics. But like Pap, she’d become quite the well-liked lady in her fifties and through to her death at 69 years of age. She believed in God without question and went to church when her arthritis allowed it. Often speaking of the Bible, she strove to be a devout Christian, and in fact, was so for her last twenty years. So all I ever saw was Gram and Pap in their silver years. They had already worked out the kinks in their lives before I ever knew them. They had done all the trial and error, made all the humiliating mistakes, committed all the embarrassing acts, all before us kids were even conceived. Thus we have no first-hand knowledge of any impropriety on their part.

Now as a young adult, I still had heroes like Captain Marvel, Isis, Wonder Woman, the Incredible Hulk, and too, my grandparents. Because I had no knowledge of their wilder times, I thought that Gram and Pap had been their good way all their lives, and so I fallaciously expected that they, when they were my age, had the same wisdom, and that they [had] therefore, never been more selfish, less understanding, and less loving than I knew them to be as grandparents.

But I was wrong. I did not account for the inevitable growth that occurs throughout the life of any healthy person. According to my thinking [as a nineteen year old boy], they must have been at my age as they were in their sixties. It never occurred to me that they’d   evolved   into their current characters and that perhaps in their late teens, they too were likely as wild as me in mine. So in my early twenties, I tried emulating them, but couldn’t, and so, surmised that I was inferior because I just couldn’t find their qualities in myself.

Obviously now, this was clearly ignorant if not irrational thinking on my part. Unlike Captain Marvel, Isis, and Wonder Woman, Pap and Gram were real human beings with real pasts. They’d come a long way to get where I saw them standing in the 70s, a journey most of which I was not privy. So even though they’d seemed perfect, they’d not always been so, and so should not have been revered for always having being so.

The problem with my sort of hero worship is that it puts the hero person on a pedestal by inviting us to believe that they never had or never contended with the shortcomings that we have ourselves, that they somehow avoided the more distasteful aspects of growing up. Of course we know intellectually that no human ever walks on water. But on an emotional level, we often act like our heroes are perfect and can do no wrong, and in fact, never did any wrong. Then our esteems of them become artificially elevated as we affirm such illusions, again and again.

Part of the illusion is that these people were always stronger, wiser, and more self-sacrificing than are we, and that they could never have been as imperfect as ourselves. This makes emulating them most difficult, unless of course you’re a good actor. It’s next to impossible to emulate perfection unless you are yourself, perfect. If we’re going to truly duplicate the depths of any good quality you’d care to mention, then we must walk paths similar to the heroes’. We needn’t walk precisely the   same   path. But we must walk   some   path that imparts to and shapes the same values within us as profoundly as the path the hero walked imparted and shaped his values to him. No shortcuts. And that path would necessarily be longer and more challenging than simply imitating the heroic actions.

In light of this, among some other obvious complications that I’ll not get into here, it’s no wonder I had such trouble mimicking my grandparents in my treatment of   [First Love].   Gram and Pap’s actions spawned from fifty years of life experience, which I of course, did not have. I could not therefore, rightly expect myself to be like my grandparents the least pretentiously until I had acquired the same level of life experience, which by the way, I still have not, and all this was over twenty years ago.

Back then, [this] deficiency [of wisdom] was even more pronounced. My illusion of their always-advanced nature pushed me into countless futile exercises to be like them without knowing what it really took to emulate them, and much self-deprecation when I failed. I might have avoided this if I had only seen their esteemed standing in their sixties as the product of years of less esteem, and not an innate quality that only the better, more worthy humans had. But I suppose this is a big part of what growing up is all about.

I must confess that I’m struggling here with how to express this idea precisely. So let me approach it from another angle. You remember that Star Trek episode, “Tapestry,” where Picard has that near-death experience with Q? Picard laments his behaviors as a youth (which he described later as ‘loosethreads in the tapestry of [his] life’) that lead to his reliance on a now-defective artificial heart. Looking back, Picard didn’t like his younger self, and so jumped at the chance to relive it when Q gave him the opportunity. For Picard, setting things “right” meant avoiding getting stabbed by the naussican. But as you probably remember, that regretted stabbing while seen by Captain Picardas the result of his immature, barbaric behavior, was also instrumental in his current-day success as captain of the Enterprise. With that part of his life history changed, the captain was no longer a captain, but a lowly lieutenant instead in a dead-end, low-skilled, no-excitement, mundane job. His less well-tempered history though bad, was just as necessary for his becoming captain as the more pleasant doings.

The point: Few heroes have a pristine history. Some of it is good, and some bad, but   all   of it so necessary for the hero to be a hero. Virtually always, if we’re talking about true-to-life human heroes, they do have a bad side if not in their present, then definitely in their past. Though the apparent absence of a bad side intensifies our awe of such people, we must remember that it is most certainly there, so we don’t come to see the heroes as holier than thou, and as higher than human.

Now, getting back to the question of higher opinions for level five doers as opposed to level three doers: It could be that the chronic mate-seekers lack no more esteem-able health than the love-satisfied self-actualizers. Picard was actually a better man for having indulged his aggressiveimpulses as a cadet, though he devalued his earlier self because of them. My grandparents were upstanding people but only after they had gone through a period of non-upstanding ness. Perhaps like these, love-seekers are simply at an earlier stage in their social development.

Given all this, as well as reading the first hundred pages of  [Abraham Maslow's book]  Motivation and Personality, I think now that we’ve wrongly pitted level five needs gratification against the lower levels in these dialogues. I’ve done it. You’ve done it. The general tone here has been me justifying my level three needs and disregarding the higher level ones. You on the other hand, appear to favor level five pursuits, as you’ve cited the numerous pitfalls of the more animalistic level three needs and the trouble to which ungoverned level three passions can lead, and indeed, have lead you yourself. You work on level five gratifications, while I work more at level three. Given the debating nature of these talks, we’vecome dangerously close to errantly dichotomizing these needs as though one is more right than the other. Fortunately, your email on Sunday clarified this. Again, I think we both understand that it’s really not an either-or situation after all. Ideally, level three comes first. But when we can’t easily gratify level three, then the next best thing is to focus on levels four and five. While this will never completely mitigate our level three needs, you’re right, it’s better than doing nothing.

If you think about it, this makes no more sense than say esteeming adulthood over childhood, for these are just different stages of humanity, neither one inherently more respectable than the other. Healthy adults don’t fault a child for being a child, though his youngling status means that he can’t do everything the adult does. No, the healthy adult empathizes with the child because after all, he was a child himself once, and recognizes his own childhood as a necessary step along the path that lead him to his adulthood. So he doesn’t fault the child for being where he was once. It’s like righteously proclaiming our peaceful nature by slighting the warriors, forgetting that we too warred in earlier generations, to gain peace within our borders. The warriors today, though they might seem repugnant, are simply doing now what we had to do then to erect the tranquility upon which we now stand while looking down on them. Can we avoid double standards by faulting them for following our same path? Likewise, those happily functioning at level five should not disparage thoseworking on lower needs, lest they become hypocrites. It’s too easy and unjust to blame a bum for his plight, while we live in warm shelters with fully-stocked refrigerators.

This is a typical response however. Maslow describes a tendency in humans, once they meet a lower-level need, to take its gratifier for granted, to begin thinking that we no longer have that need, to start believing that need to represent an underdeveloped, untamed, uncivilized side of humanity which we have evolved beyond, and then in the extreme, come to despise its gratifier. Many discard the gratifiers only to find that the need they thought had gone forever comes back with no less intensity than when they gratified it the last time. But again, especially in light of your Sunday email, I see that you’re not doing this.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

The Need For Love Is Healthy

Thursday, September 22nd, 2005

Dear [Mentat],

Well, the possibilities of a blind person becoming a jet pilot would seem to be markedly lower than mine of finding my dream girl, and so his dream would be more unrealistic as a result. After all, I at least have   some   experience with such women on my arm, not to mention the fact that many other men of similar gifts to myself have already done what I wish to do. The same is not true of the [aspiring] blind pilot though. He would probably never have an opportunity to fly a plane, even with an experienced pilot holding his hand. Plus, there would be no others like him in the air to illustrate the achievability of his dream. There would be no hero, no one whose footsteps he could follow, and little encouragement in general. So he has far less reason than I, for holding on to his dream [of becoming an aviator]. [Few] have done his [dream], but many have done mine successfully.

Further, the dream of becoming a pilot would seem to be higher in [Maslow's] needs hierarchy (levels four and five) than that of fulfilling the love needs. As such, his is a less urgent dream, and normally, its thwarting injures to a lesser degree an otherwise healthy man’s psyche than having to become resigned to never finding a lover. I suspect that far fewer people suffer psychopathological consequences who must give up their dreams of flying planes, than who must live their lives without love. You’re right that the blind pilot would do well to think about his dream rationally, realize that [the] chances of it coming true approach zero, and then choose a more attainable goal from the [many] choices available. However, I’m sure you also understand, as you indicate, that the lower the need is in the needs hierarchy, the less effective can rational thinking be at quelling it, and the fewer the ways there are to gratify it. So while we might rightly expect the blind pilot to find something more fitting to do, expecting a man seeking love to find a more fruitful quest is quite a different [and dubious] matter. I think you get this [...].

Also, before your email this past Sunday, I thought that you attributed too much flexibility and changeability to the love need [as though it's an optional need]. I was skeptical [...] that you had managed to appreciably reduce its fire without actually gratifying it. But I [wanted to say that] if the need really is not urgent for you, then that’s wonderful that you’ve learned how to put aside our carnal urges [...].

Now some of this I wrote before last Sunday and it may not therefore apply now. So just ignore the issues mentioned that you’ve already addressed. That said, the tone of the emails up until Sunday [suggested] that [you're] convinced that giving up the love dream in the healthy person should not seriously impact his “psychical well being,” and you’ve hinted that if it does, then that person is [...] weaker than he could be, too obsessive, too needy, not as self-sufficient as he ought to be, or not as advanced [...]. But again, gratifying the mating desire with anything else but a real mate just doesn’t work as well in most people. If you can do it, then you are way the exception [...] and I admire your resolve to do it, given the situation you laid out yesterday.

[We need love, and that's okay.] I recommend that you reread   Motivation and Personality   because Maslow discusses at length the pathologies (negative consequences) of thwarting any of the basic needs, and he lists lots of complications that can (and so often do) result from ungratified love needs. The data suggest that letting this desire go unfulfilled would   naturally   threaten even an otherwise mentally healthy person’s psychical well-being, because more so than level four and five needs deprivation, the unsatisfied love need causes measurable sickness in people — shorter, less healthy lives, less ability to concentrate, greater tendencies toward harmful addictions, more tendency to behave anti-socially, and on and on. In short, people aren’t in any meaningful way inadequate for having the love need, even though that need makes them more vulnerable to others. Blaming the lovelorn for their sickness of love starvation is little more useful than maligning a man for becoming parched when he has no water to drink. I may not be good enough for most women as I am. Yet the empirical data I have suggest that I   am   good enough for   some. I stay on the quest because all I’m dong is trying to fulfill a destiny laid out by human nature. I’m thirsty, and I not only have the right, but also the obligation, to do whatever I can to quench that thirst, lest I spend the rest of my life lonely, an abbreviated life at that.

There is no more immediate use for one’s brain power and talents, than self-gratification. My mother says often, “Tom, you’re wasting your brain and your education sitting up in that room all the time.” But I say, “No, I’m not because now more than ever, I’m finally focused squarely on what really matters.” Not sure she understands that fully. But that answer seems to satisfy her. Being happily involved is a right that one day I hope to enjoy. My need for love indicates strong (not weak) health.

Tom Hesley

Eliminating Selfish Urges

Thursday, September 22nd, 2005

Dear [Mentat],

Yes, when our own craving urges are so strong that, like a powerful radio station close by, they swamp the other, weaker signals on the band, such as   her   thoughts, feelings, and wishes, then this would indeed cause problems, and be detrimental to any relationship. When craving makes us overly selfish, then it would rightly be deemed too strong. We may be les effective therefore at serving ourselves if focused too much on the self. However, unless gratifying that craving would hurt someone else or violate their rights, or it would jeopardize us in some way, the best way to reduce it is to fully indulge it. Indeed, according to Maslow, the people who have been able to satisfy their basic needs with consistency for sustained periods yearn to fulfill such needs less in later life, and are better able to withstand periods of thwarted needs without becoming obsessive or depressed. It seems thus that if we want to cure ego centrism, then we [must] first be egocentric. If we want to get rid of ignorance, we must first be willing to be green.

Tom Hesley

Love Quest Obsession

Friday, August 19th, 2005

Dear [Mentat],

We’ve been talking about the obsessive quest for love; you sighting its disadvantages and wanting to stay clear of it, and me its proponent, embracing it and attempting to show why it’s necessary to the excellent man.

Continuing the discussion, I offer another advantage of serious questing (whether for love or anything else): The hunt itself enriches the soul, even if in the end, we never manage to bag the prey. It supplies meaningful reasons for living and the stamina for executing life’s many pursuits, motivating us to learn about many things while seeking our big answers. Quests, fruitful or not, advance us closer to supreme understanding and self actualization.

You know, I was musing the other day that until last year, I had no regrets. I never felt I made many bad decisions. Even with bad outcomes, I usually knew that I had made the best choice possible given what was known at the time. But lately, my history of academic laziness at WPSBC troubles me. Though I tried there, to read classic literature, history, and philosophy, I simply couldn’t stay awake through it. True, the sugary, caffeinated beverages and the late nights we kept, contributed to the chronic drowsiness. But the reading was also boring, just like algebra, geometry, and Spanish, because I saw no relevance of these materials to electronics or mating – my two biggest dreams then. What would this stuff ever be used for? Its benefits just weren’t clear when my voice was high, and the fact that adults   forced   us to study further closed my eyes to any goodness of knowing about X, Y, and Z, not to mention the differences between inductive and deductive reasoning. If a teacher then could have connected the dots and showed how literature, history, and philosophy could help solve problems that would plague us later in life, I might have been a straight-A student.   :-)     Naaaaaah!

Fortunately, though tardy, my Love Quest has done this. It’s made literature’s relevance clear, albeit twenty-five years after graduation. The problems posed by chasing the Big Dream (what you and I have been scratching our heads on now for some years) might well have already been solved in a great novel that I just never got around to reading yet. If I had read more books growing up, during that time of high mental pliancy, I might not today be struggling to find the answers which have eluded me for so long. If only a teacher had said back then that the more we read, the better equipped we are to tackle life’s injustices, I might have discovered my current-day zeal for reading that was nowhere to be found a quarter century ago.  [My] quest instilled the reading passions lately, and this is good. The Quest is good. In this way, it has improved me.

Speaking of Dr. Phil, you’ll be pleased to know that he agrees with you on this subject, advising people not to focus on finding relationships. Like you, he says that a person should indulge his other passions first. Don’t go to bars, clubs, grocery stores, or any other mate market with an agenda. Go without hidden motives, simply because you like going and not because you want to meet a mate. In terms of The Triangle, he’s telling his audience to reach for Ego and Self Actualization needs, before they fulfill their Social ones. This sounds rather ill-advised to me.

Then, he gets too spiritual, and says to believe that if it’s meant to be, a relationship will happen, without looking for it. I agree with this partially. It really does go just this way for some people; specifically, the prettiest. Certainly, the    most attractive   among us need put forth the   least   effort to snag a high-quality mate. The prettiest girls don’t have to go to dating services or get their friends to match them up with blind dates. All they need do is walk down a street where guys are, and by the time they reach the next block, they’ll have been hit on several times. Relationships find them, and they’re sitting pretty because they never have to risk rejection.

It’s no wonder that attractive people (like Dr. Phil) advocate this wait-for-it-to-happen attitude. Why not? For them, happen it usually does, without them ever lifting a finger. Indeed, a basic tenant of evolutionary psychology is that the prettiest are most destined to mate. (Studies show that they’re the ones who most often actually do mate.) Rewording this slightly, you could say that nature means for the prettiest to be loved the most. And when nature means for you to love, it’s easy to say, “If it’s meant to be, it will be.” Dr. Phil offered nothing truly profound here.

But things don’t work this way for the average or the ugly. Indeed, the less desirable the man, the fewer the women who will want him. Clearly, this necessitates a higher degree of dedication from him than from his more attractive peers, so as to find one who does. The average Joe just can’t afford to be passive here, because relationships   don’t just happen   for him. Not like they did for Dr. Phil. Nature thwarts rather than favors the lovelorn, which is probably why they’re lovelorn in the first place. For Average Joe, nature’s good intentions aren’t so abundantly plain. Such people learn early that nature does not intend goodness for them, and so they learn not to count on it for that. While it may still be “meant to be” for him, love is by no means as easy to achieve. So he must try and try hard, because virtually all of us, pretty or not, are subject to Maslow’s Triangle. We have a strong need to be loved by a quality mate, and unless that’s satisfied, we won’t achieve maximal fulfillment in the triangle’s higher need levels of Ego and Self Actualization. Its queer how Dr. Phil’s philosophy doesn’t seem to account for The Triangle, and how he doesn’t often acknowledge the existence of alternative rules of social engagement which the less attractive among us must follow.

It should be plain that the rules of how to get love differ vastly among people, depending on how attractive they are. Thus, there is no one patent way to approach relationships. Neither the devoted nor worldly ways are always right. Perhaps the most attractive can afford to be Worldlys and still have fulfilling unions. But this approach is often only right for other attractive people, and has little value for the less desirable, who are negotiating an entirely different social landscape. This is why I get so frustrated with Doc Phil because he often targets his advice to the most attractive, and the applause and groans of his audience tend to discount the points of view of the Average Joes. But hey, it’s his show. He’s free to run it as he wishes, of course. I only mean to point out the limits of his advice and to underscore that his “words of wisdom” work well for far fewer viewers than who actually watch the show.

Not only do effective mating strategies differ between the more and less desirable mates, but as you know, they also differ vastly between men and women, attractiveness notwithstanding. Traditionally, ladies have not aggressively sought mates. In the high school dances in the 50s, women lined up off to the sides of the dance floor, awaiting the men to invite them out. This still happens in the bars and night clubs today. As found among most species, human females tend to defer to males to make the first move – to come to them, and to take all the initial risks. Many telephone dating services employ this philosophy to get women to join by only charging the men, while the women use it for free. The more assertive, risky, and costly role has been, and will be for centuries to come, the male one. So we’d expect females to support a more passive approach to mating than men. Indeed, when Dr. Phil related his wait-for-it-to-happen view above, it was the women who were heard applauding the loudest.

So, female passivity is still true even though we’ve reached the post feminism age. Though equal rights abound today, women still largely favor   The Gentleman, who opens doors for them, pays for their meals, and takes the bulk of emotional risks in order to advance the relationship. They like the man to drive and be the initiator. Yet they often say they don’t approve of his assertive antics, claiming that they couldn’t ever imagine behaving that way themselves. But the fact that they wouldn’t behave that way doesn’t explain their dislike, though they frequently offer it as such. Why should they behave like him? After all, they’re female, not male.

What actually determines how she’ll react is not so much his behavior as it is how attracted she is to him. Prettier men get away with more. They can disrespect, neglect, and abuse their women without worry of her leaving. Even if she does go, they’ll have no trouble finding another. But let me get back on track here and say that women on the TV talk shows frequently fault the male approach to relationships, sighting his obsessive compulsions as saboteurs in the relationship. And males, like Dr. Phil, buy into that, because Dr. Phil knows that he’s going home that night and sleeping with none other than a woman. For him to support anything other than his just-let-it-happen-by-itself approach, would not bode well with his wife. There are clear differences between male and female approaches and the problem with TV talk shows is that they tend to lump everyone into one pot, where one approach is right for all. Not so, as I hope I’ve made clear. :-)

Okay, okay. I got carried away. I promise, I won’t write anymore in response to   this   part of your letter. Also, I guess we’ve drifted away from the central theme of this thread – about whether or not we handicapped men can do better than handicapped women. Let me say that I think we can, but with difficulty. Parker found himself a fully functional woman. And if he can do it, … well, you know the rest.

We may not have to do better though, if we find a   right   handicapped woman. As noted in previous posts, there are a few of them out there, though they’re quite few and far between. But whether or not we do better is irrelevant so long as we find someone we consider supreme. History proves that it’s possible for us both to find preeminence in eyes that don’t see well. You’ve loved   [First Love],    [your sweetheart from the late 70s], and probably others. I’ve loved [First Love],   [Alandra], [...] and others. They were quite good. So even if nature restricts us to dating only the handicapped, well, given the love we’ve experienced from these women, perhaps that’s not so bad. But no matter who we seek to date, the climb is up a steep hill for us, and we won’t reach the top of this hill via half-hearted or no effort. We’ve got to focus, because with focus comes clarity. And with clarity comes clear direction. And with clear direction and a willingness to follow the path, success will likely come.

More later,

Tom Hesley

Playing Best Together

Friday, August 19th, 2005

Dear [Mentat],

Now, continuing the arguments for steadfast dedication to relationships and little else besides shared endeavors, let me say that my brief experience with the Lions Club has introduced me to many couples from around PA, who have been married for three to five decades. While we can’t know what goes on behind closed doors, in public at least, most of them seem very happy and enjoy participating in Lions activities together.

Now I’ve gotten to know four of these couples. They don’t spend much time apart. Whatever their external interests, except for reading perhaps, they share together. Whenever I’ve asked them to drive me somewhere, they both come along. Rarely does one appear without the other at an event. They speak of their happy times, and help each other lovingly. When they   are   apart, they talk much about the other’s accomplishments. They need each other, but in a good way. They comfort each other and help one another through life’s difficulties and fears. They don’t come across as being obsessed with each other, because their obsessions in that vein were satisfied long ago. More on this below, where I discuss Maslow’s Triangle. They each know implicitly that the other loves them, and this state of affairs drives away the insecurities that fuel much obsession. A lifetime of dedication to each other seems to have made them better off as individuals, ironically.

We need not thirst for water to know its necessity. As long as the thirst remains quenched, we’re free to go about our lives as we desire, largely unencumbered by that thirst. However, we’d best provision to keep ourselves irrigated, lest we become parched and unable to focus on anything else but more water – lest we become obsessed. The absence of thirst can by no means be construed as an absence of need. Rest assured that the one who appears to have no thirst for love, [probably] still needs it, and probably has a source of it that you don’t know about.

Good relationships are much like this, as exemplified by these Lions Club couples. Healthy love satisfies a genetically evolved thirst for a productively advantageous mate. While the absence of love is not as dire as a missing water bottle in the desert, it can nonetheless, likewise compel us to dedicate efforts to get love, just like being thirsty motivates us to seek water above all else. These Lion couples however, are not thirsty. Each participant in the couple respects and does whatever he can to fulfill her emotional, mental, and physical needs. They rely upon and trust each other implicitly to do that, and as long as each does her part, the individual strength the lovers derive from the other is astounding.

You’ve heard the saying that behind every great man is a great woman, and vice versa. The great person does not thirst for adoration, because he has an assured and abundant supply of it, and so his mind is free to focus on issues of world importance – issues outside the relationship that sustains him. Paul McCartney, Ronald Reagan, Dr. Phil, The Bushs’, and so many others all have wives dedicated to them and their happiness. Dr. Phil’s wife appears with him on every show, a testimonial to the notion that there are women supremely dedicated to their men and families out there, and that relationships overflowing with this dedication can indeed work well. Linda McCartney learned to play the keyboard so she could be with Paul and help in his performances with Wings. Most CEOs and other high achievers are married. In fact, people live longer, healthier, more productive lives on the whole, who do not live them without lovers. In this way, dedication to relationships first can actually help one achieve renown in external pursuits, rather than hinder him. Devotion does not always thwart Worldly. In fact, it may be a precursor to worldly pursuits, as discussed next.

Maslow’s “hierarchy of needs” triangle shows that   social   needs (the need to be loved, belonging, and inclusion) are lower in the hierarchy than the needs of   self actualization   (the needs for development and creativity and worldly pursuits). His theory suggests that the lower level needs must be satisfied first, before the higher level needs become high priority. That is, we don’t worry about solving world hunger until we’ve satiated our own hunger. Indeed, the emptiness I’ve spoken of after promotions at [work], likely happened because I was trying to fulfill   ego   needs (those of self-esteem, power, recognition, prestige), before the lower-level social needs were met. Extrapolating from my own experiences as well as The Triangle, it’s foolish to attempt self actualization until our love needs are met.

Now, back to our happy Lions Club couples, they want not for love,   not   because they’ve mastered the ability to stand alone, but rather, because they accept just how crucial to their overall success a good lover is. They embrace the concept, and were lucky enough to find it. The love that surrounds them enables them to achieve their excellence, as per The Triangle. Indeed, gratification in love is the foundation of self actualization needs. Their relationship does not retard them in those higher level pursuits so long as they give it its due. In this light, a relationship is a necessary step to achieving world-class excellence in any other pursuit, and is a big reason for me to be devoted to getting love.

I’d like to achieve great things both within and outside a relationship, and as discussed previously, tried to do so without love, but couldn’t really. I want to achieve greatness, but only after I achieve love. I understand today that my need for love is more immediate than that for career or hobbies. As noted, I feel that the right woman would eliminate the emptiness I noticed when achieving at [work]. In those days, if I’d had a warm bed to come home to, a nice meal prepared by loving female hands, and a lady to be proud of me who would boast of me to her friends where I could hear her, the victories at work would have meant more.

Now it may sound like I’ve been favoring fierce dedication to love instead of Worldly pursuits as a life philosophy. But let me clarify that. I didn’t mean to suggest that there’s no place for worldly pursuits. I just think that before one can concentrate whole-hog on them, he must first satisfy his love lust, as inferred from Maslow’s Triangle. The time for world-class excellence comes   after   those needs are satisfied, not before, and not during the love quest, but only once love is won.

With all that said, obsessive focus on relationships is often shunned by Worldlys, as a behavior that   healthy   people do not display. However, particularly prior to, as well as early in a new romance, obsession with the relationship is normal, and well. When asked what their relationships were like when they were younger, these Lions Club couples tell of pining, particularly early on, when their beloved’s affections were unsure. Uncertainty about when or where the first kiss would come heightened their preoccupation with the romance. But once the couples grew close and actually exchanged that first kiss, that intense concern vanished, and along with it, excess obsession over the relationship in general. While some overly righteous, “healthy” people exalt themselves by claiming to have purged their longings for love through some form of mind control like meditation or indulging heavily in unrelated pursuits, I say not so fast. After all, the vast majority of us have these cravings, yearnings which are built into us by evolutionary design, just like our water thirst. The   most   well-adjusted person stands strong because he’s satisfied his cravings for love by actually finding it, not by renouncing it and learning to function well without it.

Of course, not all cravings are alike. That is, while it wouldn’t be good to satisfy a craving for illicit drugs by seeking them out, other cravings, such as that for love, can only be fully eliminated by obtaining and keeping the object of desire. Not all cravings are bad. The craving for love does not carry the same harmful consequences as say, the cravings for excess food, tobacco, and other vices. So we can’t say that love lust is bad just because it bears some of the same earmarks as those cravings that lead to bad ends. Unlike the bad cravings, that for love is a good one, because it’s realization will actually improve a life.

Tom Hesley