Archive for the ‘Trust’ Category

How To Attract Women

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

Though I’m neither Don Juan nor James Bond, I have enjoyed some successful and fulfilling relationships.  In fact, I’ve shared my bed with sixteen intriguing women through the years, and while I acknowledge that far more women have rejected me, I nonetheless seem to know something about picking up women; given the successes I’ve enjoyed. My approach is easy, and I’ll share it now.  Use this information to help you find a girlfriend, a wife, or friends-with-benefits lover.  Whatever your objective, you won’t go wrong being sincere.

Generally speaking, I focus more on being the right way to interest a woman, as opposed to doing the right things to seduce her.  In fact, my most enjoyable love connections required very little effort to be different than I actually was.  I’ve come to understand that pretending to be stronger, wiser, richer, taller, older, younger, or in general, better than I actually am only works in the short term.  Soon, reality surfaces, and as I’ve found, if she doesn’t like the real you, you’ll lose her regardless of how well you deceived her prior.

I don’t believe in exaggerating our accomplishments or hiding our shortcomings.  My conscience won’t allow it.  In short: Leave that best foot at home, and let people meet the real you, right from the start.  While you may not interest as many women initially, the ones that do come to you will probably stay interested longer, and the connections you form with them will be more rewarding.

This basic philosophy is    the    cornerstone of my entire “technique” for impressing ladies.

Be Assertive But Reserved

One lesson I learned early on how to attract women is: Don’t try too hard.  I’ve found that scheming, gaming, and other covert sorts of persuasion don’t work usually.  There’s only so much you can do, and attempting to do more than that might make you appear pathetic and excessively needy, as illustrated in this story about   trying too much.

Remember, it’s not about quantity; but quality. Attracting one right woman is worth way more than drawing fifty of the wrong ones.

Pursuing more than one lady at a time can land you in hot water; particularly if they learn about each other. You may be drawn to one very special lady.  But if she discovers that you’re courting several, she may cut you off, for good.  Then, for the pursuit of quantity, you’ll have missed out on the opportunity for quality.

However, for those women that you most desire, make sure they know of your interest quickly.  If you’re too slow about letting them know you like them, someone else may come along and sweep them away from you forever.

Be Kind But Careful

Be kind; but not so kind that you seem too good to be true.  Exaggerated kindness can in fact work against you.

Indeed, kindness only goes so far to persuade a woman to fall in love with you. While it may convince her that it’s safe to fall and that by all rights she should   fall, the truth is that unless she’s already attracted enough to you    to   fall, all the kindness in the world won’t   make   her fall.  In these cases, the energy you spend on being overly kind will not secure her heart; even after years of pursuing.  This waste of your good energy is often humiliating and frustrating.  Rejection particularly hurts when you’ve spent much of yourself to win her, only to have her tell you in the end that you’ve lost her.  In this way, expending too much effort at kindness without first assuring that it’s going to be well received, is foolhardy.  Make sure that she  can   love you before campaigning too hard to convince her to love you.

But if you’re too unkind or mean, you’ll put off any self-respecting lady worth loving.

Get control of your anger.  If a lady makes you angry very often, your best bet is to find someone else more compatible with your temperaments.

Be Honest But Tactful

If you’re dishonest, you’ll mislead her.  You may fool her now but will probably be sorry for it tomorrow.

Getting a lady’s attention with pretense is risky business.  Not only do you risk her being disappointed with the real you once that comes out, but also, she’ll likely find your deceptions highly offensive.  This can cause irreparable damage to your relationship in that she’ll have problems trusting you going forward.  Indeed, in my opinion, little good ever comes from lying in a relationship.

More on honesty later.

Be Urgent But Patient

If you’re impatient, you’ll scare her. But if you’re too laid back, she’ll think you’re not interested. So if you want to find a girlfriend, you must be able to walk this very fine line and stay balanced.

Be Available But Busy

If you’re unavailable, you’ll risk losing her to someone who is easier for her to access. Dating more than one at a time can make you less available than you need to be to any one of them.

Hobbies keep you from feeling too lonely when she’s not around.  Plus, they give you things to bring to your relationship and make you a more interesting person.  Now don’t fake a hobby.  If you’re not interested in tuning pianos, then avoid doing that just to win her heart.  The most interesting people are people who do the things most interesting to them.

Be Slow But Move Things Along

Learn to slow it down.    Asking for too much, too soon can not only make you appear desperate, but can also suggest that you’re too single-minded and that all you want from her is the very thing you’re campaigning for.  The sorts of ladies I’d pursue, would not appreciate premature expressions of sexual interest.

Be Gentle But Forceful

In these times of heightened violent crimes committed against women by men, ladies are understandably concerned for their safety when they meet any new fellow; no matter how attractive they may find him.

Be Courteous But Natural

Always respect her.  However this does not mean to forever yield.  in fact, it’s normal to disagree sometimes.  So by all means, disagree, when there’s readon.  But argue respectfully.  Calmly stick to the issue.  Avoid personal attacks on her character, history, family, and so on.  Yet avoid shying away from contention now and then.  This demonstrates that you “have a back bone” and can in fact stand up for yourself when needed.  It also shows her that she cannot push you around.  So, she’ll be less likely to take you for granted.  Gently remind her occasionally that you bring some power to the relationship too.

Be Confident But Humble

Being confident is not so much about all that you’ve done, the places you’ve been, the money you’ve made, and the people you know.  It is however, about you being comfortable with who you are, no matter what you’ve done or failed to do with your life.

A degree of confidence comes from realizing that so much of that “chemistry” that most of us seek in our relationships these days, is actually beyond our control.

If you try to control something that’s not controllable, you’ll fail, and this can undermine your confidence and make you afraid to try it again.

Be Quiet But Expressive

Keep the details about what you like and dislike in women to yourself.  If a lady gets the idea that you’re too particular, or suspects that she won’t measure up, this can complicate your efforts to take her home.  You’ll heighten her insecurity if you supply a laundry list of your requirements.  Being honest is not the same thing as complete openness.

If you think about it, there’s really no need to get specific.  As long as you know that she either meets or fails to meet your standards, that’s what’s really important.  She need not know why you like or do not like her.

Be Yourself — No Buts On This One

It’s supremely important to be yourself in any dating relationship.  For details, see my    Tom’s Views –> To Best Attract Women, Be Yourself!  piece.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Bitter Sweet Attention

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

I heard from [Kar] yesterday.  She left me voicemail, curious about how Mom is doing since the heart failure diagnosis last week.  That was sweet of her to remember my family in these trying times.

Now I do not normally let a call go unanswered.  In fact, on the seldom occasions that I do, I agonize over the choice for days or even weeks.  But then very often, I end up calling the person back anyway.

The history that [Kar] and I share is painful; the central theme being her failure to grant me the affection I wanted as often as I wished.  That’s the bitter part of her recent attention. It’s great when I have it but intensely painful when I do not, and with [Kar], I usually do not.

Her concern over Mom is nice; making it so easy to forget all the other times that she was simply not there for me.  But when she does show some regard, it’s tempting to assume that she’s changed for the better and that if I do call her back, she’ll be more reliably affectionate.  But I’ve been down that road before, and things usually do not work out that well.  Actually, [Kar] is typically pleasant long enough to suck me back in.  Then, she withdraws once more; leaving me hurt and disappointed again.

While I do not believe that she intends to slight me like this on purpose, I’ve come to know that her fondness of me is sporadic; whether her fault or not.  On rare occasions, she welcomes physical involvement.  But most of the time she shuns it as she did in May of 2009, when I last visited her in Philadelphia. Sometimes, I grow tired of getting rejected by [Kar] so often, and if not for how much laying with her excites me, I’d have ditched her long ago.

I see disregarding her call as an opportunity to avoid further needless rejections because if she did it before, she’ll likely do it again.  I got rejected by her a lot and have found that clearly, one way to cope with rejection from   [Kar]   and in the love quest as a whole, is to reduce my exposure to pointless refusals as discussed earlier  here.  Plus, knowing [Kar] as well as I do, I sense that she’ll make me wait; hinting all the while that she’d enjoy a foot massage when finally we get together.   But then, when that visit finally occurs, she’ll delay and deny me.

Now I like to assume that she does intentionally play hard to get.  But when she does, it sure feels like she’s playing with me; the way a cat toys with a mouse.  It allows the mouse to think that it’s getting away for a little while before pouncing on it and restraining it once again.  [Kar] does me like this by letting me think that she’ll grant me special favors when I visit; but then changes her mind.

I remember often the good times [Kar] and I have had since meeting in 1998.  Even today, images of us together physically, tantalize yet haunt me as well; though we’ve not been with each other like that since 2002.  She was delicious then, and fantasies of what might be often soften my resolve to avoid her. Indeed, they lower my self-esteem in that her appeal makes me willing to put up with treatment from her that is more often bitter than sweet.

But as alluring as she is (in fact because of that), I must decline further involvements with her, to avoid the love rejection she’ll surely dole out if I grow to depend on her emotionally.  Our history makes it impossible to trust her to care for me, should I allow myself to need her again.  While there’s probably no place I’d choose to be over sharing sweet times with [Kar], there’s also no place that would cause me more subsequent pain once I fall out of favor with her.   She’s flighty (like the Greek goddess Aphrodite),  and so, can be quite cruel when she grows tired of a fellow.  So, no, I’ll avoid returning her calls this time.  God, give me the strength to stay this course, please.  I don’t care to face getting rejected yet again.  Thanks.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Judy’s Silent Rejection

Monday, June 7th, 2010

From audio journal episode:  AJE-2010-05-31-21-52

I thought when I got back in touch with [Judy] a few weeks ago (details  here), that things would be different this time.  But so far, we’ve only talked once on the phone in nearly a month, and my messages have either gone tersely answered, or totally unanswered.  So, I’m concerned.  It seems like I got rejected by her yet again.

Further, the single time that we did talk, she revealed some disheartening information; stuff that suggests that her feelings for me are today, no deeper or abiding than they were in 1997; the year we met.  I fear therefore, that allowing myself to “fall” for her again will only result in the same emotional torments that I remember so well from those early days.  This feels like I’m getting rejected all over again, just like before, and I’ve just barely put my toe in her waters. 

Indeed, I wonder just how caring [Judy] would be now based on the choices she made at first, and in the years since.  Plus, I might either lose romantic interest altogether, or go too far the other way, and fall head over heels should we become romantically and physically involved.  Either she won’t care enough, or I’ll shortly stop caring as much as I do.  Both scenarios daunt me. 

But a third situation scares me most of all; that I’ll keep caring too much, and she’ll continue caring too little, just like last time.  She’s always been less vulnerable to me than I’ve been to her, and I so hate being “the underdog.”  It’s happened too many times with [First Love], [Vee], [Emeebee], and others.  I’ve waited for them to call or write way more than they have on me.  At this point, [Judy] appears no different.  So I’d need some intense assurance that this imbalance does not exist, before fully sinking my heart into a new romance with [Judy].  It’s no fun getting rejected by the same person yet again. 

In 1997 and 1998, [Judy] was usually unavailable to talk on the phone; even though I was paying for all the calls.  Eventually, we agreed to establish a Saturday morning call schedule, and we’d talk for an hour each week.  Not bad.  But after a few weeks, this fell apart as well, as [Judy] took to traveling, schooling, vacationing, and other pursuits.  Something always seemed to get in the way of our growing closer. 

Unfortunately, it seems that after a month, we have the same patterns emerging all over again.  Not even thirteen years has changed this apparently.  So time does not heal all wounds.  I’ve sent three emails and one voice mail; two of those messages have gone unanswered, and the other two were tersely answered at best.  True, our one phone conversation a couple weeks ago was highly enjoyable.  We got caught up and shared our current life aspirations.  But I want conversations like this a couple times a week anyhow, and I wish to be able to count on them occurring.  But with [Judy], though they’re nice when they do happen, this sharing is hard to come by on a consistent basis.  Though she says all the right things, she typically does not act them out, and she’s slow to reply besides. 

As I’ve written previously, a mission of mine is to avoid those who repeatedly care insufficiently; especially those as intensely sexy as [Judy].  She was beautiful 1997, and based on things she’s told me recently, I suspect her to be just as pretty now. 

Further, as it did then, her extra allure makes her inattentiveness hurt more than the same behavior from someone less well-endowed would.  So, I do hold prettier girls to higher standards of affection and special treatment, to best protect myself from needless pain because greater appeal implies a greater chance of deeper hurt.  So deciding to pursue a “perfect ten” accordingly, warrants greater caution. 

Thus with [Judy] so extraordinarily stunning therefore, coupled with her apparent casual regard for my feelings, I think I’d best halt pursuing her for now.  I wish never to again experience the pains of 1997. On many August and September afternoons at that time, I could feel depressing waves of dismay roll over me and hold me down many times, as I lay on my couch at the Ben Franklin Parkway place, unable to concentrate on work.  [Judy’s] choice to be absent so often hurt me so much that for some weeks, I cared  nothing about advancing my software engineering career.  I can’t afford such distractions today. 

She and I have a rich history of disagreeing on how quickly and in what fashion our relationship ought to develop.  So I’m concerned that we’d continue the arguing, if what we have now is allowed to blossom into more than mere friendship.  I so wish to not repeat history.  But history does tend to repeat itself, as humans tend to be creatures of habit, and [Judy] appears to be no exception. She acts today as she did back then, and I feel today as I felt back then.  Indications are that her tendencies where I’m concerned have not changed through the years, and so repeating our history is a virtual certainty if I was to show my belly again.  I’m sure of this for reasons I’ll bring up below.

She always says things that make me think that perhaps we really have something wonderful this time.  But she rarely backs up those pleasant words with supportive actions. Her failure to return my messages in more timely manners is proof of this, and is likely a red flag that I should heed and stay away.  Why?  Because if she doesn’t care enough after all this time to behave in more consistently affectionate ways, then she’s never going to.  I’ve conveyed my interest and done what I can to assure her that I’m for real.  She’s even lamented about wanting someone to hang out with in New York City, and that she hasn’t sampled more of that great place because she has no one to see it with. I’ve told her that I’d love to be her guide and have her be mine.  But her silence persists.  Yes, we may have something very special.  But it seems to be lopsided; tilted against me.   

In fact, her choices in the 1990s support this conclusion.  They suggested with piercing ferocity that she cared way less back them for me than I did for her.  Indeed, my pain then was likely a strong signal from my intuition to get clear immediately because something was terribly wrong with the situation.  But I listened not; ignoring my better judgment in the hopes that I’d guessed her incorrectly, and that she would someday, come around.   The “electricity” I felt anytime she’d touch me proved impossible to ignore.  So any doubts I had about her intensions I pushed aside; that is, until the emptiness became too much to shoulder.  Eventually, I finally ended all communications in the winter of 1998; but not before I’d already invested a lot emotionally, and hurt a big amount when no return on that investment came back. 

Up until our severance, I told myself everyday that I was just being childishly insecure, and that I was worrying too much that she did not love me. I made excuses for her; saying that she was young and thus, inexperienced.  So, I should allow for a little inconsistency and lacking resoluteness in her.  Young people, I reasoned, need lots of time to sort out their priorities, and it wasn’t fair that I expect her to know her life at 23 as well as I knew mine at 37 years of age.   

She said back then that she loved me.  Yet she cancelled a three-day visit she’d earlier agreed to make to Philly over Labor Day weekend; opting instead to travel out west and spend that time with friends instead of me.  Now in her defense, as a consolation she offered to meet me for dinner at the train station during a layover on her way out there.  But we’d only have had a couple hours together instead of the few days that we’d originally discussed.  Well, I was so angry and hurt that she’d decided not to stay longer, that I told her thanks but no thanks. 

As mentioned above, these sorts of disappointments plagued our entire first-round involvement.  In the following months, reaching her by telephone once she’d gone back home to eastern Europe grew increasingly difficult. She was just not around enough; good excuses notwithstanding.  Getting rejection after rejection from beautiful ladies like [Judy] just seemed to be my lot in life, 

She’s led quite a colorful life though ever since I’ve known her; finding both time and capital to travel extensively.  Indeed, she told me last month that she had come back to America several times following the summer of 1997; the year we met for the first time.   In 1998, she returned to work as a cocktail waitress in Atlantic City; a mere two hours from Philadelphia.  I would have taken the bus there to visit her often; if only I’d known she was there.  In 1999, she came back to see other parts of the US; all of which were a mere phone call away.  In the early 2000s, she reappeared to secure a language teaching job in CA, and lived out there for at least a year.  But though I was happy for her and all of the enriching experiences she was no doubt acquiring through all her visits, I couldn’t help but wonder: Why in all that time she was so close by, did she never, EVER call me?   There’s no reason I can fathom except that she just did not desire it. 

She also revealed that she met an American man in CA, fell in love, got married, and took him home to the Czech Republic, where for several years anyhow they lived happily.  They’ve separated now however, because one day, he just up and admitted that he simply did not love her anymore.  Apparently, once he got over there, he found the Czech women way too appealing to stay married to [Judy], and he has since moved another woman into the very apartment that he and [Judy] once shared.  Nice guy, ‘eh?    Anyway, she’s come back to the US yet again, without him, to escape the pain of seeing him so often with other girls. 

But while her plight saddens me, I’m offended too because she was here all that time.  She said that she loved me, and that she appreciated the depth of my feelings toward her.  Yet she chose him, (HIM!) while I was so easily reachable.  She could have picked me, and I would have moved mountains to get to her.  But she didn’t, and now that he’s left her and she is once again without a man, does she view me as a mere consolation?  That’s probably so, given her inattentiveness.  So could I ever trust that she’s come to think of me as “top dog” when she’s for so long treated me as second best?  Probably not.  Besides, she’s making plans to move back to her country if things in NYC don’t brighten for her over the next year.  Scary.  I mean, what if I fell deeply in love with her again only to have her say one day that she’s leaving?  Not good.  I might take this risk if this was the only worry.  But with all these other misgivings, this is just one more of an already robust collection of straws that finally broke the proverbial camel’s back, I’m afraid.  I’m uninterested in trying to overcome any woman’s indifference, even a lady as exciting as [Judy]; especially a lady as exciting as [Judy].  She may pity me, yes.  But she’ll never love me. 

Perhaps intellectually, she realizes now that my feelings might have lasted longer than his.  She may reason that I’m a great guy, based on the consistency and enthusiasm I’ve offered her.  But nonetheless, she’ll never love me.  It seems that she’ll always return my rejected love to me, unopened, unappreciated, and painfully unrequited.  She can tell herself all the good things about me she wants.  But this will never make her heart skip two beats when I walk into a room where she is.  She may have intended, by choice, to work to build a new association between us.  But her heart’s just not into it.  She likes me, and may want to help me.  But she’s not enthralled with me. 

In light of all this, I doubt that I could ever believe that she would come to see me as her night in shining armor or her prairie song.  Throughout our history, she just hasn’t been around enough, and this has not changed in the entire thirteen years we’ve known each other.  She doesn’t care for me in that way; though she tries to disguise this fact with kind words and pleasing conversation when pressed.  But again, her actions speak a different story; way more loudly than anything she might say.  While she has COMpassion; she has no passion for me.  I see that clearly; though she may refuse to. 

Though I don’t blame her for what she feels (or does not), at times I can’t help but cringing and feeling a little angry at her for all that time I spent in Philly, where we could have been together, but were not.  Those were lonely years for me, and her nurturing presence could have made all the difference between the joyous existence that I’d so hoped to find when I moved there, and the life of melancholy that I actually experienced.  I could have fed her French fries, covered her ears when loud trucks passed by, and shared my umbrella during those blustery late fall evenings, when ocean winds whipped around those tall downtown buildings.  We could have skated at The Palace, strolled along South Street, sampled the finest of Philly cuisine, ridden the subways, and taken in all those great cultural and historic attractions that southeastern Pennsylvania offers.  But instead, I did most of that alone, with a hole in my heart all the while.  I needed her.  But she chose not to be there, and try as I might, I don’t think I’ll be able to fully forgive her for that chronic absence; though that was thirteen years ago.  Seeing me has never been a high priority for her.  In fact, she could have located me, had she really wanted to; my name has been all over the Internet now for at least ten years, and my phone numbers were always listed in the telephone directory.  So a couple simple Google searches would have revealed me to her.  Nonetheless, it seems that she never tried. 

So it must be clear to readers now that learning that, at least during one of those summers she was so close by but did not bother to call, really upset me.  While I’d never wish her to do anything that she did not wish herself, I was still surprised to learn that I carry some of that old anger for her today.  So why is that anger still within me?  Because, with her words, she mislead me into thinking that she cared more than she did, and perhaps it’s that deception that is making my blood boil now because she was at it again last month.  Our history has fanned my sense of foreboding, and I hate relationships that have anger built into them from the get-go.  I just wish she would have owned up to her lacking feelings for me during those early months, and I resent her because she didn’t.  If our history is any indication (and I think it the best one), she’ll always and frequently discover other places and priorities, that please her more than I.  I’m just a better-than-nothing to her, and I’ll never strap myself to that lovers cross again. 

Thus, now that I’ve had a few weeks to fully absorb all that she told me last month, I’ve become quite comfortable in my decision not to pursue her further and to reject any pursuits she herself might initiate; for history shows that she actually cares less than she says, and she’s still never around enough besides.  I see a pattern now as warning that back then I’d become so caught up in, and hated.  So I’m hell bent on steering clear of it in this second round.  I love her so.  But because of that, I must avoid her like the plague, since she does not love me with equal vulnerability.

I may discuss this with her at some point.  But after one voice mail unanswered and one email message tersely answered, not to mention that weeks have elapsed since she last called, I think I’ll just let her discover this on her own.  So effectively, I’ll reject her for all my rejected love that she’s declined, in the same silent way that she’s rejected me repeatedly; not because I wish to “get her back” mind you.  It’s just easier to say nothing; particularly since getting hold of her has proven time and time again to be so difficult.  Besides, talking about this further will not change my mind, and I’ll never be able to convince her to love me in the ways that I need to be loved.  While I enjoy fantasizing about the two of us together, my wakeful side realizes that in light of the evidence, both then and now, this will never be; not really.  I can’t keep getting rejected from people who are sure to reject me. 

I’m trying not to take her disinterest too personally.  But I expected to hear much more from her by now.  So, it’s time to move on, and thus, I’ll trouble her no more.  Should she call again, I may say all this.  Or I may direct her to this blog.  Or, perhaps I won’t answer the phone at all.  We’ll see.  I owe her nothing at this point; and am hard pressed to volunteer any compassion right now.  I got rejected, and I’m raw from the experience.  So she’d have to do some fancy rjetorical stepping to convince me to allow her to do this to me again.  But that’s not happening! 

Take care.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Giving Up Online Dating

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

I received a stats message from match.com today.  I’ve been a member there for the past 12 years, and in that time, my profile has been viewed 6,825 times.  Wow.  That number surprised me.  But though this count of views might seem high, the number of women I actually met through Match is less than 20, and the number that I got a relationship going with, stands at just 2.  I’ve sent out well over 15,000 winks and emails, and have spent hours into the thousands logged in there.  I’ve revised my profile and posted pictures nearly a hundred times.  Yet I’m still without my soul mate.  In fact, I must conclude that online dating just does not work for me.  So, it’s time for some drastic changes in order to get off this rock I’ve been stuck on for the past five months, and re energize my love quest. 

I feel that it’s time now, to abolish this whole online dating practice.  What’s that old saying?  When something you’re doing repeatedly does not work, you change what you’re doing.  Indeed, while I concede that for many, Internet introductions work very well, I can’t say the same for myself.  When I started, the possibilities implied by access to a bigger pool of potential dates, quite intrigued me.  It mattered not, that most of them lived thousands of miles away, because in 1998, the year I first appeared in the web dating arena, few roots held me to where I lived.  So I would have relocated to just about any metropolitan area in the US, to be with my dream girl, had I found her. 

But over the years, I’ve developed strong ties here in my first, real hometown, which I moved back to in December of 2001, after over twenty years of residing hundreds of miles distant.  I’ve lived here now for over eight years, and have grown quite fond of this house, the land, the culture, and my family; so fond in fact that last year, I realized that I wish to live out my remaining days right here, in  this  place.  I do not want to move anywhere again, for this is one of only two places where I’ve not seriously longed to be somewhere else.  This is my truest home, and I know all too well the pains of leaving it, even if taking up residence elsewhere means that I could finally be near my lady princess.  For perhaps the first time in my life, it’s more important to stay here on Pleasant Valley Blvd., than to be anywhere else, though my dream girl might in fact, be waiting for me there.  I’d rather be here, alone, than anywhere else, with a goddess. 

Besides, long-distance relationships are pesky, troublesome little beasts I’ve come to know, because the distance obscures the details that should be crystal clear in order to intelligently decide to be with a particular other for the long term.  I might think I love her while multiple states separate us.  But even when she’s temporarily close, as in when we visit one another, important details surrounding our true compatibility remain shrouded, and in this circumstance, it’s very easy to confuse true love with lofty fantasy.  It’s only when we begin moving toward a day-in and day-out closeness that I can really tell how I feel about her, and usually, I ended up feeling nothing. It’s hard to know someone well, who lives not in your town.

Indeed, a stranger   really is   a stranger when they live far away, because there’s usually no one to ask about them in my city that knows enough about them them to provide a meaningful voucher.  I can’t easily learn how they treat others, “through the grapevine”.  Nor, do I  typically hear others tell stories about them when they were little. So, there’s no one close by to warn me of potential problems, or dangers in fact.  The world of long-distance relationships is fraught with risks and potential gotchas, and in this, my 50th year, I’m notably skiddish about fully trusting someone, without others to confirm what they’re telling me through the sharing of local folklore, traditions, and stories.  I like knowing others, who know my lovers too.

Yet in my experience, online dating was all about long distance romances, as very few local, eligible women posted profiles.  If I was going to online date therefore, I had to be willing to do long-distance; and I was, for a lot of years.  But my life has changed such that I can do that no longer, as I have less money these days for plane tickets, hotels, restaurants, and the other big costs of traveling to far-away places. Plus, I like being at home or nearby, and so, am less eager to travel today than I’ve ever been.  This is   my   home.  I take care of it, and so, worry over it when I’m gone.  I have my junk and tools in the basement, that I miss when I’m three states away.  In fact. where once I’d boast of the number of hours I rode on Greyhound buses to get from Dayton to Altoona, I now enjoy telling others how many months it’s been since I last left home for more than a day or two.  I just don’t like traveling much these days.  Thus, online dating therefore, with its implied extensive traveling, must go, as I’m just not up for it today.

So, how will I meet desirable women, if not through online dating?  Well, stay tuned, and I’ll let you know, as soon as I have some answers.  :-)   Comments are welcome.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Dear Emmy

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

Dear [Emmy],

Sorry I’m three weeks late answering you. But as you know, it’s been a busy time around here.

At any rate, I’m glad that my family and I can be here for you; it feels good to know that we’re making such a positive difference in someone’s life, a special person who really needs it.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm!

Yes, when we find someone special, what we thought mattered before, often does not once we fall. I guess I had enough other stuff that you wanted, to make you forget your “muscular” dream guy.  Clearly, I’m not that.  Yet you still love me. 

I guess if we had been totally right together, I would not have desired other women. So don’t think that it’s normal to put up with your boyfriend wandering. If he really wants you, he won’t play in other fields. Some people make open relationships work well. But ultimately, I want more; I’d rather be exclusively involved with someone I’m crazy about. When she’s around, I think only of her, and no others.

We all have imperfections to accept, and we must trust that others accept them too. If they don’t, then we move on. Easier said than done, yes. I’m middle-aged, and still struggle with this. But take my word for it.  This does get easier as you get older. Besides, it’s not like you’re missing an eye or sporting a gaping scar on your forehead. Whatever your imperfections, they’re not obtrusive except to someone who is really looking for them. I don’t see them at all.

Again, you worry too much, and again I must remind you that you’re   choosing   to worry. So stop it!  If [Linda] ever meets you, she’ll agree. You are a beautiful lady in body, mind, and spirit.  Once you believe that deeply, no one can make you doubt it. I wear thick glasses, so I’m looking for women who see past them; you must do the same with your insecurities.  Seek people who do not see them.  There’s a wealth of accepting souls out there who would never notice those “imperfections” that trouble you so.

Finally, as we discussed the other night, even in the worst case where no one accepts you, there should always be one person who does; and that person is   you.   You don’t need others’ acceptance to accept yourself, because   you’re okay,   no matter what they think.

As for no men ever finding you pretty: Nonsense! Every time we go for a walk, guys gawk at you. I think they’d look even more if I wasn’t there; they might even approach and say hello. Whatever scars you have don’t affect how men see you. I have scars, [M]. I have scars, moles, cysts, and my legs are very short for a man of my height (28’’ pants length). Indeed, many of your friends find me plain, and some have even said that I’m ugly as you know. But no matter [M].  I’m okay. I don’t need their approval to be me, and you need no approval to be you.

Now, if you were so butt-ugly that no one paid you any mind, then I’d understand your looks worries. But this is not the case and you know it. Many people think you’re tops because they’re always commenting about how pretty you are. Look at all the guys who’ve hit on you since you and I started. You might not desire them, and I’m not saying you should. But do not dismiss them. Take their compliments to heart, as proof that you’re not as plain as you imagine. Sometimes, what others think   should   matter; especially the positive stuff. So keep the positive and discard the negative.

Yes. I got many rejections in 2004 and as painful as they were, I grew a lot from them. I learned that people’s judgments should only mean so much.  They should not affect how we accept ourselves. Hopefully, you won’t go through so much before you really get this.

When it comes to finding my dream girl, I’m no quitter. As we’ve discussed before, I promised myself back in 2001 that I’d either win the love quest, or die trying.  I’ll never give up; and neither should you.

The quest has taught me so much about others and myself. It’s moved me to read books of all kinds, watch relationship TV shows, and to meet all sorts of diverse people. I learned too that most of what people judge us on when they like us, is   not   within our control. [Linda] is a remarkably beautiful woman. Yet most of what makes her this way is beyond her control.  Her nature and nurture did it primarily, just as my nature and nurture made me find her so magnetic. We can’t really make people fall in love with us; certainly not by having a few small scars lasered.

My point, [Emmy], is that   most of who you are is already set,   and   it’s that part of you that makes people love you if they’re going toSo don’t worry so much about becoming more lovable. Give up the idea that you must impress someone to make them fall.  Stop regretting what you do not have, and start relishing what you do.  Most every pot has at least one lid that fits it well. So try less to reshape your pot, and try more simply to   find a lid that fits your pot, as it is.   :-)

Take care.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Thin Desires

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

A while back, I recorded an introduction for a chat line in Philadelphia. I described myself and listed my favorite activities — reading, programming, watching Star Trek, and the like. I said I wanted to meet tall thin women, and it didn’t take long for the hate messages to come. You’d think I’d threatened the pope! They called me shallow, superficial, and lame, and these are the nicest words. Even some thin women complained.

But what they didn’t get is that I can’t help what I like, and I like thin. Real thin. I learned this the hard way over two decades of dating the heavy. So I never want to try that again. I’m no bigot, but do wish to avoid any more disappointing experiences like those I’ve had already, dating “big and beautiful” ladies.

I’ve tried to see beauty where I wouldn’t find it. Often I dated the frumpy, the stocky, the plump, and the obese, only to find no excitement when they finally reached my bed. In all cases, I suspected at the instant we met that this would be the outcome. But I didn’t trust my opinion as a young adult and didn’t want anyone to say that I hadn’t given the relationship a fair chance. So against my better judgment, I waded into these murky waters. Then I struggled to get back out, because I felt guilty over hurting the women. I’d take months to work up the courage to say good-bye, feeling lousy about them and myself all the while. A couple times, I had to seek professional help to break away. What a waste of time, and money!

Though I found the Rubenesque unattractive, I had compassion for them nonetheless. Seeing them cry as I jilted them really tugged at my heart strings. But ultimately, it came down to either their happiness or mine, and though I struggled with this often, eventually therapy helped me to chose mine and make a break.

I’ve always been more attracted to the petite. Even as a boy of five or six, my eyes followed the lanky lady teachers around the classroom as my ears savored their every word. I wanted to hear what they had to say, and I got better grades as a result. I listened more to those with the ostrich legs, but slept more in buxom teachers’ classes. Or I’d peer out the windows, bored to tears. I didn’t choose to feel as I did. I just did.

There’s nothing immoral about a desire particularly when it’s the product of evolution and, not chosen. So please! Don’t punish me for my wants. They are after all, my nature.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Love – Mere Chemical Response

Monday, March 12th, 2007

Dear  [Melinda],

Well, we may never fully agree on this.  I would urge you however, to check out the book list I sent you a few letters back  [here].  That chemical reaction stuff is   not meaningless   as I see it.  In fact,   it is supremely meaningful.  It is the spark that ignites the fires of romance, and it helps keep us tolerant of the beloved’s eccentricities.  It simplifies the getting along with the beloved through the bad-mood times, and is the primary reason why I’d want to get with someone as opposed to remaining alone. 

I’d submit that your disappointment with your   love at first sight   [LAFS] experience happened not due to any inherently superficial traits of LAFS, but rather because your man didn’t feel it for you at the same time.  LAFS always hurts when it’s not reciprocated.  But I don’t think that we can infer from this that since LAFS can hurt badly, that it is totally worthless as a spice in relationships.  If this guy had returned your affections, I promise that you’d be singing a different tune today.

Yes, LAFS often results in what you call the one night stand.  This happens because LAFS implies a set of assumptions that we make about those we desire.  We’re predisposed for example, to assume that life with them will be wonderful due to these feelings, even though we’ve not adequately checked them out.  But as we do check them out subsequently, we often find that our initial assumptions were unwarranted and just plain wrong.  A personal example:  In my teen years, I’d blindly assume that a particularly attractive woman would be wonderful in bed just because she looked good on the surface.  But usually (not always but USUALLY), this turned out to be false.  Yes,  LAFS can send the less seasoned on wild goose chases, as it did me, and as it did you.  But LAFS is like an opportunity.  Some opportunities are good, and very many are bad.  However to achieve happiness, we should ignore all opportunities just because many of them I the past turned out fruitless. 

Yes, I’ve read books like [The Torah], [which take a stand against LAFS and unrequited love desires.  They, as you suggest, often advise to follow one's mind because emotions and desires can lead the seeker to only short-lived highs, as opposed to long-term happiness.  But senses like the eyes only provide the data.  It's the mind that interprets it, and decides what it means and whether and how to act on it.  So any misleading that happens as a result of visual cues is generally not due to inadequacies in the eyes themselves,  but rather in the extrapolations that the mind makes from the visual information.  Any fallacies in the senses can be shown therefore, to emanate from fallacies of the mind.]    And yes, I do feel that [said books] tell an important part of the true love story.  I just contend that they don’t tell the whole story.  Check out this book:

  • Why Can’t I Fall In Love   by   Shmuley Boteach

As I’ve said before and I’ll say more below, the feelings can indeed lead one astray.  But not always, and when they do not, the resulting relationship makes all the prior pain in waiting for it worthwhile.  In my humble opinion.   :-)

Yes, you are right.  And, I wouldn’t want to [get] involved with someone unless all these underlying conditions are met [honesty, free of drugs, compassion, humility, healthy body, credit score above 700, and such].  All this stuff has to be right in order for me to move forward.  [LAFS admittedly, does not create the lovable traits such as these in the beloved; it's just a way for the seeker to identify that a particular someone just might have those traits.  Yes, LAFS is often wrong.  Thus it cannot be a sufficient condition for a successfully happy love relationship.  But it is a necessary condition for happiness in the sort of relationship I would like to find.] 

Yes, the initial chemistry can’t keep a seriously faltering relationship going.  But it can spur us onward to take the time necessary to determine the presence of these [other qualities in the beloved]. 

[Now] I can’t deny the workability of this delayed falling in love phenomenon [that you speak of].  Like you, over half the population says that they prefer this sort of slowly-grown love feeling.  But then, over eighty-five percent of the population believes in a god, whereas I do not.  Thus majority rule does not always make for   right rule.  All I can say about the slow discovery of love is that I’ve never experienced it, though I’ve tried many times.  Over the years, I’ve dated thin people and fat people, whites, blacks, Hispanics, short, tall, educated, and not, who did not initially attract me; some I spent close to a year with.  Invariably however, the result was that I’d end up having to leave because I’d dream about walking down the aisle with them only to wake up terrified.  My subconscious mind won’t allow me to advance relationships beyond the casual dating phase unless I feel deeply attracted to the person.  Such women indeed exist who make me feel like this.  I know that because I’ve been fortunate enough to experience a few [...].  These experiences, though few, have readjusted my expectations of women such that I can’t in good conscience, date those who are not beautiful from the start.  And I miss those pleasures in relationships where they do not occur straight away.  It’s like the disappointing experience of eating a bottom-round cut of beef once you’ve grown accustomed to eating porterhouse steak.  Relationships without that initial allure are big let downs for me. So I can’t do them. 

[So you say that you disagree with LAFS because of how it led you to pine over someone who eventually turned out to be not who you really wanted after all.]  But just imagine though, how good it would have felt if that someone that you pined over actually had the same feelings for you.  No, as noted, LAFS does not guarantee success.  [But it[ does however, make whatever success happens very much sweeter. 

Well, I can’t immediately speak to this point [about brain scans of schizophrenics and people experiencing LAFS looking very similar] because I’m unfamiliar with the details of schizophrenia.  I’ll read this article if I can locate it.  

As far as this yearning passion being short-lived:  Yes, in many instances it is.  But in many others, which I’ve experienced myself, it lasts, and lasts, and lasts.  It really depends on the two people involved in the interaction.  I believe the real problem with LAFS is that people over-react to it.  They assume that it guarantees success.  But it does not.  All those practical concerns about a lover must still be allayed like:

  • Is he trustworthy, honest, and thoughtful?
  • Will he hurt me tomorrow if I love him today?
  • Is he a good provider?
  • Do we have similar religious and moral values?

And so on.  No, LAFS dos not excuse us from getting these answers before escalating the level of intimacy in the relationship, though it does make such reckless abandon quite tempting. 

Well, it looks like we’ll just have to disagree on this.  My personal experience and research indicates that “yearning passion” is so much more than trivial instinct.

  • First, it’s a very mental process.  That is: There are numerous assessments that one’s subconscious mind must make before it allows the [LAFS] feeling to occur.  If it finds any deal-breakers, it prevents such feelings.  I remember once in Philly, when I was weekend bar-hopping.  There was this pretty girl sitting at the counter, sipping a martini.  I wanted to get to know her because her physical form, at least from a distance, appeared to be everything I was seeking in that aspect of a woman.  So I walked over to converse.  But it turned out that she was mildly mentally retarded, and not finished college much less high school.  Though friendly, she spoke too loudly and her life concerns centered more along the lines of who would be helping her get dressed tomorrow.  Needless to say, these differed extensively from mine.  As soon as I knew this, her physical appearance lost its enticing aura, though her body had not changed in proportion during this exchange.  She retained the same face, height, weight, poise, dress, and scent. But once it was clear that we had nothing substantial in common and differed so much in terms of intellect, her allure, in my eyes, ceased.  Given this, and other experiences like it, I can’t accept that these feelings are driven solely by a lovers physical form.  Their mental aspects also impact this as well.  The Evolutionary Psychology books I listed for you a couple letters ago delve very deeply into this mating instinct, and show that it’s quite complicated.
  • Yes, LAFS is very often temporary; but sometimes not.  Sometimes it lasts a year or two, sometimes a month, and quite often, it puckers out after but a few seconds close encounter with the beloved.  Clearly, LAFS can be temporary.  But is it always so?  the following questions come to mind:  Does this make it a totally useless measure of a person’s long-term potential to attract us?  I think not.  Why not?  Let’s discuss the process of peeling an apple, which should help us understand this transitory nature of LAFS better.  Often, on the surface, apples look quite enticing.  But peel them and slice them up and you then see what’s really inside.  Some apples have rotten cores or contain worms and bugs, and upon discovering these we don’t wish to eat them anymore, our desire replaced with revulsion.  So in this case, our interest in the apple was indeed temporary.  But other apples with healthy worm-free cores continue enticing us even when we cut them open and see their insides.  Thus, the condition of the apple appears to affect how we regard it throughout the process of learning about it.  Some appear wonderful the whole time we know them — from when we first see them in the store until that last delicious bite at home.  But others, while at first appearing to be delicious, lose their appeal should we discover major flaws.  So with apples, our interest does not always evaporate.  Nor does it with LAFS.  People, like apples have various layers that we must learn about before we can know that our LAFS is justified, and of course we set the bar much higher for a person that we’d consider loveable, than we do for an apple in order that we consider it delicious.  But the ideas are the same.  There are some people (rare though they may be), like the truly healthy and delicious apples, that meet our essential expectations from the first minute after meeting them, until death parts them from us.  It’s easy to find people who’ve been married for fifty years or more and who say that they’re just as much in-love today as when they first met.  So the point to all this is that LAFS does not always lead one to a bad mate.  Yes, often it does.  But on those occasions when it does not, the resulting love affair is most fulfilling, and can indeed last a lifetime. 
  • LAFS is instinctive yes.  But I’m curious why you disparage instinct.  After all, without it, we and all other locomotive species would have never survived.  This is no clearer than in the case of human babies who are born with the breathing and suckling instincts.  Could you imagine the difficulties in teaching a baby how to draw breast milk into its stomach?  Without this pre-packaged knowledge, the baby would die of starvation very soon after birth.  LAFS I’d argue is a similar instinct (or at the very least, and instinct remnant).  It is the culmination of thousands of years of evolution, and historically, it’s been a quick way of identifying who we might mate with that would most likely perpetuate our genes in the most healthful manner.  Sometimes, instinct is good.  :-)
  • Procreation may, as you say, be the exclusive objective of the mating instinct.  But this is a big thing, particularly since so much of our biology is geared toward reproduction.  Thus, reproductive advantage [or natural selection in general] permeates human values.  So in trying to figure out just what our values are, it’s a safe bet that most people want to live and pursue relationship in ways that promote procreation.  It’s intuitive that a strong mating instinct is more likely to produce offspring than a weak one.  So if our interest is in perpetuating the race, then we should not trivialize the mating instinct, for it is those who ignore it that are lead astray I suspect. 

Yep.  I can’t argue there.  Certainly the actions that the members of couples take to demonstrate their love for one another are key to the overall quality of the love experience.  Having a wealth of shared experiences strengthens the love bond to be sure.  And finally, my experience with [Emmy] has enhanced my abilities to recognize and fulfill someone else’s needs.  Being useful to someone like [Emmy] and having them express their appreciation in return is quite the aphrodisiac, like LAFS.   While I would say that LAFS is by no means the ultimate form a love relationship might take.  But when built upon using those shared experiences to which you refer, the resulting relationship is tops. 

Yes, that initial passion that screams so loudly in the first months of a budding romance does become more subdued over time.  But I wouldn’t want to continue a relationship where it has disappeared altogether.  Whenever looking at my woman ceases to offer any excitement whatsoever, then it’s time to move on.  However, if we pick wisely in the first place, the chances of this happening are drastically reduced. 

[...] I’d much rather experience [love] than to [...] just talk about it.  [But when the experience of love is unavailable, then talking about it is the next best thing, and so, can still be quite stimulating intellectually].

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Inner Love Motivations

Sunday, March 11th, 2007

Dear [Melinda],

Well, I would say that love manifests itself outwardly through the actions of the one who harbors it.  However, my definition doesn’t stop there.  Mine is also concerned with the inner motivations that drive those actions.  So why do I care about those?  A couple reasons:

  • All actions begin with motivations within their perpetrators. 
  • The depth and degree of these motivations drives the sincerity of the resulting actions.  The motivations determine whether for example, the actions are the result of true love, or of a hidden agenda or other form of dishonesty.
  • You might argue that a person’s feelings of love are an unreliable motivator, and thus, the love actions based on them are likewise unreliable.  However, trusting in sheer will (devoid of feelings) to consistently motivate love actions over the long term is at least as dangerous, and I’d argue that it’s more so.  Why?  Well, consider that it’s much harder to stay motivated to consistently show someone loving kindness without the yearning [...] and the gratification that results from satisfying those yearnings.  Without these pleasures as reinforcing rewards for the behaviors associated with love, a person will likely grow bored and leave; maybe not tomorrow or next week.  But s/he will leave eventually if he gets no pleasure (feeling) from staying. 
  • Also, people’s wills are as fickle (or as stable) as their feelings.  This is so because the choice of action and the feelings that motivate it are so tightly bound in the human psyche.  It really boils down to the pleasure principle.  People perform better at tasks they enjoy doing than those that they’re indifferent about or hate.  In love therefore, people do not act without motivation to begin the whole process and if the motivations are pleasant, then the more genuine the actions and dedication they’ll show their lovers. 
  • I’ve found true love-at-first-sight [LAFS] to be the longer-lasting and the most consistent of the various motivators of love actions.  I still feel love for my   [First Love],   even though she and I have not spoken for nearly ten years.  If she would have treated me better, we’d still be together.  The problem with love-at-first-sight is that many people mistake it for something more transitory.  Many think that it’s really just a physical attraction that is instigated only by the beloved’s physical form (shape, sound of voice, scent, and touch).  But it’s actually so much more.  It may be one of those ineffable phenomena that nearly half of the population never experiences.  But anyone who has will tell you that it indeed exists and that they can’t imagine loving anyone with any depth without it to guide them, and studies of it suggest that relationships that have it, tend to last longer and the people get along much better.  The mysteries surrounding it will likely fall away once humans [can] objectively determine its presence through medical scans. 
  • Love may end with action, but it starts with feeling, and if we understand the mechanisms that produce such feelings, and can therefore make better mate selections as a result, then we will have improved the actions themselves. 
  • Love is not a completely selfless exercise, unless perhaps, you’re loving a child or an aging parent.  [In fact, the healthiest love is quite selfish.]   In my view, there must be some sort of pleasing payoff for loving; else why love at all?

No, I have little use for the commercialization of love feelings. Yes, I [...] question the depth (and sanity) of anyone who falls in love simply because they received a dozen roses.  These items are [great for expressing] an already-existing feeling, but not [as good at creating] it [in the first place].

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Feelings Make Melinda Pretty

Thursday, March 1st, 2007

Dear [Melinda],

Oh shucks. You wouldn’t show me your feet? I truly hope you trust me not to reject you just because you have rough soles. No. No pedicured or adorable feet are necessary. At least, not in your case. My feelings make me see only your beauty.

When the right feelings occur, oddities in a lady’s physical form don’t seem to matter as much. I don’t fully understand the psychology, though I believe strongly in the idea. Surely the cosmetics industry would rather women not learn this because if they did, then cosmetics commerce would slow to almost no volume at all. Imagine if the conviction became wide-spread that women only need makeup during the first few minutes of new relationships, and that it thus plays no proven role in sustaining a love affair over the long term. Economic calamity to be sure.

Nonetheless, in spite of the great stock people place in makeup’s perceived benefits, there’s an ineffable trait about deep attraction which appears at first to be contradictory. But over time, whatever it is that makes us truly love someone seems unaffected by makeup, clothes, the softness of one’s skin, Etc.. That is: Attraction in the heart of he who desires the woman seems to spawn largely from her physical form. Yet once the romance takes off, small to moderate “imperfections” in that form do not diminish the feelings initially inspired by that form. Interesting that what, in the beginning is so necessary to fan romance to life, lessens in importance later on. Once big enough, the fire keeps burning, and no matter that the spark that started it goes out. In fact, once the fire reaches a roaring din, the spark seems quite small and insignificant, though before ignition that same spark was all the light there was, and seemed a much more significant force. I suggest that our history makes things like [your] rough feet and bunions [that you've mentioned] inconsequential in my eyes. Your feet may be a bit rough. But to me, they’ll always be the beautiful, kissable feet of a queen who fully deserves a man’s worship. So I urge you not to be self-conscious of their condition because our time knowing each other has created a sort of aura around you that hides your marks. I only see the beauty in you.

There. Now you have a small taste of the sort of philosophizing I’m doing in my book. J Comments welcome, even if you hate it.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Dear Melinda

Wednesday, January 31st, 2007

Dear [Melinda],

Interesting idea about moving to the southeast or southwest. I’m glad that you feel that you can trust me enough to enter into business together. However, my life mission is set, at least for the foreseeable future. As we’ve discussed, I want to resolve this weighty mating issue one way or another, and then document the journey in my autobiography. Perhaps one day, when I have more of the story written, I’ll share it with you and you can help me edit it and resolve any legal issues with it. Also, Diane (my sister) is married and her husband has a thriving barbershop up the road here in Bellwood. She’d never move. Besides, if you get yourself healthy, you’ll be better able to tolerate the varied climates of the northeast. I can help you charge your immune system if you wish. It would be an interesting project. But if you can’t wait to move out west until your health improves, I understand, and I support whatever decisions you make.

Great move on getting rid of the brownies. Remember this: Refined sugar is poison due to its numerous upsetting effects on the body’s homeostasis. You might check out Dr. Gabe Mirkin’s website:

http://www.drmirkin.com/

From him, I learned most of what I know about nutrition, health, and fitness. There are also numerous articles on women’s issues, and others that deal with treatments for common ailments, including fibromyalgia.

On taking shots to strengthen your immunity to dog dander: Be careful here. Your immune system may not take well to putting man-made substances (the shots) into your body. If you are truly allergic to [your dog], you may need to give her up altogether for a while.

I’m glad to help.

Tom Hesley