Archive for the ‘Judith’ Category

Judy’s Silent Rejection

Monday, June 7th, 2010

From audio journal episode:  AJE-2010-05-31-21-52

I thought when I got back in touch with [Judy] a few weeks ago (details  here), that things would be different this time.  But so far, we’ve only talked once on the phone in nearly a month, and my messages have either gone tersely answered, or totally unanswered.  So, I’m concerned.  Further, the single time that we did talk, [Judy] revealed some disheartening information; stuff that suggests that her feelings for me are today, no deeper or abiding than they were in 1997; the year we met.  I fear therefore, that allowing myself to “fall” for her again will only result in the same emotional torments that I remember so well from those early days.

Indeed, I wonder just how caring [Judy] would be now based on the choices she made at first, and in the years since.  Plus, I might either lose romantic interest altogether, or go too far the other way, and fall head over heels should we become romantically and physically involved.  Either she won’t care enough, or I’ll shortly stop caring as much as I do.  Both scenarios daunt me. 

But a third situation scares me most of all; that I’ll keep caring too much, and she’ll continue caring too little.  She’s always been less vulnerable to me than I’ve been to her, and I so hate being “the underdog.”  It’s happened too many times with [First Love], [Vee], and others.  I’ve waited for them to call or write way more than they have on me.  At this point, [Judy] appears no different.  So I’d need some intense assurance that this imbalance does not exist, before fully sinking my heart into a new romance with [Judy].

In 1997 and 1998, [Judy] was usually unavailable to talk on the phone; even though I was paying for all the calls.  Eventually, we agreed to establish a Saturday morning call schedule, and we’d talk for an hour each week.  Not bad.  But after a few weeks, this fell apart as well, as [Judy] took to traveling, schooling, vacationing, and other pursuits.  Something always seemed to get in the way of our growing closer. 

Unfortunately, it seems that after a month, we have the same patterns emerging all over again.  Not even thirteen years has changed this apparently.  So time does not heal all wounds.  I’ve sent three emails and one voice mail; two of those messages have gone unanswered, and the other two were tersely answered at best.  True, our one phone conversation a couple weeks ago was highly enjoyable.  We got caught up and shared our current life aspirations.  But I want conversations like this a couple times a week anyhow, and I wish to be able to count on them occurring.  But with [Judy], though they’re nice when they do happen, this sharing is hard to come by on a consistent basis.  Though she says all the right things, she typically does not act them out, and she’s slow to reply besides. 

As I’ve written previously, a mission of mine is to avoid those who repeatedly care insufficiently; especially those as intensely sexy as [Judy].  She was beautiful 1997, and based on things she’s told me recently, I suspect her to be just as pretty now. 

Further, as it did then, her extra allure makes her inattentiveness hurt more than the same behavior from someone less well-endowed would.  So, I do hold prettier girls to higher standards of affection and special treatment, to best protect myself from needless pain because greater appeal implies a greater chance of deeper hurt.  So deciding to pursue a “perfect ten” accordingly, warrants greater caution. 

Thus with [Judy] so extraordinarily stunning therefore, coupled with her apparent casual regard for my feelings, I think I’d best halt pursuing her for now.  I wish never to again experience the pains of 1997. On many August and September afternoons at that time, I could feel depressing waves of dismay roll over me and hold me down many times, as I lay on my couch at the Ben Franklin Parkway place, unable to concentrate on work.  [Judy’s] choice to be absent so often hurt me so much that for some weeks, I cared  nothing about advancing my software engineering career.  I can’t afford such distractions today. 

She and I have a rich history of disagreeing on how quickly and in what fashion our relationship ought to develop.  So I’m concerned that we’d continue the arguing, if what we have now is allowed to blossom into more than mere friendship.  I so wish to not repeat history.  But history does tend to repeat itself, as humans tend to be creatures of habit, and [Judy] appears to be no exception. She acts today as she did back then, and I feel today as I felt back then.  Indications are that her tendencies where I’m concerned have not changed through the years, and so repeating our history is a virtual certainty if I was to show my belly again.  I’m sure of this for reasons I’ll bring up below.

She always says things that make me think that perhaps we really have something wonderful this time.  But she rarely backs up those pleasant words with supportive actions. Her failure to return my messages in more timely manners is proof of this, and is likely a red flag that I should heed and stay away.  Why?  Because if she doesn’t care enough after all this time to behave in more consistently affectionate ways, then she’s never going to.  I’ve conveyed my interest and done what I can to assure her that I’m for real.  She’s even lamented about wanting someone to hang out with in New York City, and that she hasn’t sampled more of that great place because she has no one to see it with. I’ve told her that I’d love to be her guide and have her be mine.  But her silence persists.  Yes, we may have something very special.  But it seems to be lopsided; tilted against me.   

In fact, her choices in the 1990s support this conclusion.  They suggested with piercing ferocity that she cared way less back them for me than I did for her.  Indeed, my pain then was likely a strong signal from my intuition to get clear immediately because something was terribly wrong with the situation.  But I listened not; ignoring my better judgment in the hopes that I’d guessed her incorrectly, and that she would someday, come around.   The “electricity” I felt anytime she’d touch me proved impossible to ignore.  So any doubts I had about her intensions I pushed aside; that is, until the emptiness became too much to shoulder.  Eventually, I finally ended all communications in the winter of 1998; but not before I’d already invested a lot emotionally, and hurt a big amount when no return on that investment came back. 

Up until our severance, I told myself everyday that I was just being ridiculous and childishly insecure, and that I was worrying too much that she did not love me. I made excuses for her; saying that she was young and thus, inexperienced.  So, I should allow for a little inconsistency and lacking resoluteness in her.  Young people, I reasoned, need lots of time to sort out their priorities, and it wasn’t fair that I expect her to know her life at 23 as well as I knew mine at 37 years of age.   

She said back then that she loved me.  Yet she cancelled a three-day visit she’d earlier agreed to make to Philly over Labor Day weekend; opting instead to travel out west and spend that time with friends instead of me.  Now in her defense, as a consolation she offered to meet me for dinner at the train station during a layover on her way out there.  But we’d only have had a couple hours together instead of the few days that we’d originally discussed.  Well, I was so angry and hurt that she’d decided not to stay longer, that I told her thanks but no thanks. 

As mentioned above, these sorts of disappointments plagued our entire first-round involvement.  In the following months, reaching her by telephone once she’d gone back home to eastern Europe became increasingly more difficult. She was just not around enough; good excuses notwithstanding. 

She’s led quite a colorful life though ever since I’ve known her; finding both time and capital to travel extensively.  Indeed, she told me last month that she had come back to America several times following the summer of 1997; the year we met for the first time.   In 1998, she returned to work as a cocktail waitress in Atlantic City; a mere two hours from Philadelphia.  I would have taken the bus there to visit her often; if only I’d known she was there.  In 1999, she came back to see other parts of the US; all of which were a mere phone call away.  In the early 2000s, she reappeared to secure a language teaching job in CA, and lived out there for at least a year.  But though I was happy for her and all of the enriching experiences she was no doubt acquiring through all her visits, I couldn’t help but wonder: Why in all that time she was so close by, did she never, EVER call me?   There’s no reason I can fathom except that she just did not desire it. 

She also revealed that she met an American man in CA, fell in love, got married, and took him home to the Czech Republic, where for several years anyhow they lived happily.  They’ve separated now however, because one day, he just up and admitted that he simply did not love her anymore.  Apparently, once he got over there, he found the Czech women way too appealing to stay married to [Judy], and he has since moved another woman into the very apartment that he and [Judy] once shared.  Nice guy, ‘eh?    Anyway, she’s come back to the US yet again, without him, to escape the pain of seeing him so often with other girls. 

But while her plight saddens me, I’m offended too because she was here all that time.  She said that she loved me, and that she appreciated the depth of my feelings toward her.  Yet she chose him, (HIM!) while I was so easily reachable.  She could have picked me, and I would have moved mountains to get to her.  But she didn’t, and now that he’s left her and she is once again without a man, does she view me as a mere consolation?  That’s probably so, given her inattentiveness.  So could I ever trust that she’s come to think of me as “top dog” when she’s for so long treated me as second best?  Probably not.  Besides, she’s making plans to move back to her country if things in NYC don’t brighten for her over the next year.  Scary.  I mean, what if I fell deeply in love with her again only to have her say one day that she’s leaving?  Not good.  I might take this risk if this was the only worry.  But with all these other misgivings, this is just one more of an already robust collection of straws that finally broke the proverbial camel’s back, I’m afraid.  I’m uninterested in trying to overcome any woman’s indifference, even a lady as exciting as [Judy]; especially a lady as exciting as [Judy].  She may pity me, yes.  But she’ll never love me. 

Perhaps intellectually, she realizes now that my feelings might have lasted longer than his.  She may reason that I’m a great guy, based on the consistency and enthusiasm I’ve offered her.  But nonetheless, she’ll never love me.  She can tell herself all the good things about me she wants.  But this will never make her heart skip two beats when I walk into a room where she is.  She may have intended, by choice, to work to build a new association between us.  But her heart’s just not into it.  She likes me, and may want to help me.  But she’s not enthralled with me. 

In light of all this, I doubt that I could ever believe that she would come to see me as her night in shining armor or her prairie song.  Throughout our history, she just hasn’t been around enough, and this has not changed in the entire thirteen years we’ve known each other.  She doesn’t care for me in that way; though she tries to disguise this fact with kind words and pleasing conversation when pressed.  But again, her actions speak a different story; way more loudly than anything she might say.  While she has COMpassion; she has no passion for me.  I see that clearly; though she may refuse to. 

Though I don’t blame her for what she feels (or does not), at times I can’t help but cringing and feeling a little angry at her for all that time I spent in Philly, where we could have been together, but were not.  Those were lonely years for me, and her nurturing presence could have made all the difference between the joyous existence that I’d so hoped to find when I moved there, and the life of melancholy that I actually experienced.  I could have fed her French fries, covered her ears when loud trucks passed by, and shared my umbrella during those blustery late fall evenings, when ocean winds whipped around those tall downtown buildings.  We could have skated at The Palace, strolled along South Street, sampled the finest of Philly cuisine, ridden the subways, and taken in all those great cultural and historic attractions that southeastern Pennsylvania offers.  But instead, I did most of that alone, with a hole in my heart all the while.  I needed her.  But she chose not to be there, and try as I might, I don’t think I’ll be able to fully forgive her for that chronic absence; though that was thirteen years ago.  Seeing me has never been a high priority for her.  In fact, she could have located me, had she really wanted to; my name has been all over the Internet now for at least ten years, and my phone numbers were always listed in the telephone directory.  So a couple simple Google searches would have revealed me to her.  Nonetheless, it seems that she never tried. 

So it must be clear to readers now that learning that, at least during one of those summers she was so close by but did not bother to call, really upset me.  While I’d never wish her to do anything that she did not wish herself, I was still surprised to learn that I carry some of that old anger for her today.  So why is that anger still within me?  Because, with her words, she mislead me into thinking that she cared more than she did, and perhaps it’s that deception that is making my blood boil now because she was at it again last month.  Our history has fanned my sense of foreboding, and I hate relationships that have anger built into them from the get-go.  I just wish she would have owned up to her lacking feelings for me during those early months, and I resent her because she didn’t.  If our history is any indication (and I think it the best one), she’ll always and frequently discover other places and priorities, that please her more than I.  I’m just a better-than-nothing to her, and I’ll never strap myself to that lovers cross again. 

Thus, now that I’ve had a few weeks to fully absorb all that she told me last month, I’ve become quite comfortable in my decision not to pursue her further and to reject any pursuits she herself might initiate; for history shows that she actually cares less than she says, and she’s still never around enough besides.  I see a pattern now as warning that back then I’d become so caught up in, and hated.  So I’m hell bent on steering clear of it in this second round.  I love her so.  But because of that, I must avoid her like the plague, since she does not love me with equal vulnerability. 

I may discuss this with her at some point.  But after one voice mail unanswered and one email message tersely answered, not to mention that weeks have elapsed since she last called, I think I’ll just let her discover this on her own.  So effectively, I’ll reject her in the same silent way that she’s rejected me repeatedly; not because I wish to “get her back” mind you.  It’s just easier to say nothing; particularly since getting hold of her has proven time and time again to be so difficult.  Besides, talking about this further will not change my mind, and I’ll never be able to convince her to love me in the ways that I need to be loved.  While I enjoy fantasizing about the two of us together, my wakeful side realizes that in light of the evidence, this will never be; not really. 

I’m trying not to take her disinterest too personally.  But I expected to hear much more from her by now.  So, it’s time to move on, and thus, I’ll trouble her no more.  Should she call again, I may say all this.  Or I may direct her to this blog.  Or, perhaps I won’t even answer the phone at all.  We’ll see.  I owe her nothing at this point; and am hard pressed to volunteer any compassion right now.  I’m raw.

Take care.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Hello Again To Judy

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

Dear [Judy],

I hope this beautiful day in the northeast finds you well, and that you’re enjoying it. 

I have a friend visiting this week.  So I’ll probably not be able to call you until next week.  Nonetheless, I’m looking forward to our next talk, and am eager to hear more about your life and marriage, and why you think your husband stopped loving you.  This is a subject I’m quite interested in.    

So take care, and I’ll call you soon. 

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Found Judy After Twelve Years

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

[Discovered [Judy] on Facebook.  How thrilled I was.  She sent me a message there with her email address.  So I sent back the following.]

Hey   [Judy].

Testing to make sure I have your correct email address.  I enjoyed talking with you this evening.  Sharing the memories and hearing about what you’re up to today was wonderful.  Thanks so much for calling, and I’ll call you soon. 

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Romanceless Camp

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

From audio journal episode:  AJE-2010-01-09-14-11

Lately, I’ve been thinking of skipping camp this year.  One big reason is that, though not completely, camp has largely failed me romantically.  When I first attended as an adult back in 1995, I hoped to find continued love and acceptance from attractive women. If you’ve read much of this blog, then you know that this has been the central theme of my entire life as a man, and it’s the one thing that my life has sorely lacked.  Thus, I thirsted for alluring ladies with whom I could enjoy frequent and sustained physical affection. 

I wasn’t necessarily seeking just one lady, although if I found a goddess, I’d have been happy with just her as long as I stayed in love.  But I would have gone for multiple simultaneous dates even, if it meant being consistently gratified romantically and sexually.  Whether it takes one woman or many to accomplish this, I simply don’t care; as long as it gets done somehow.  But while it’s true that at camp, a small handful of satisfying relationships indeed developed, I’ve found no lasting romances there since 2003.  So after this seven-year dry spell, I’m thinking that camp provides an insufficiently target-rich environment in which to pursue my love quest such that I’d have   reasonable   chances of winning.  So it might be time for a change in this new decade.    

Now I wish not to completely dismiss the associations I forged at camp.  Indeed, there have been some interesting ones, as follows:

  • There was this very young adult woman in 1995 that I liked, right away, and she didn’t mind holding hands and occasionally kissing.  But she did this with many, and that put me off, just a few days into the session.
  • The friendship with   [Alandra]   in 1996 was great at the beginning.  On my end, this romance brimmed with passion.  But that summer love lost interest in me soon after that summer ended. 
  • Then, I met   [Judith], a very eligible Czech counselor in 1997.  But once camp was over, again, so too was our romantic relationship, pretty much.  Even while camp was in session, we only managed a few “stolen moments” together, as she had little time each day to spend with me due to her work schedule.  Besides, camp regulations, so it’s been said, forbid counselors from involving themselves romantically with campers, and she wished, understandably, not to break the rules.  So all I could do that summer was long for her from afar.
  • I met no one special in 1998.
  • Then in 1999, I met camper [JenGee].  But subsequent dating in Philadelphia that fall, revealed an excessively hot-headed, temperamental woman who often used the F word, and who preferred not to keep a clean dwelling.  One day at parlor on Market Street, she ate ice cream from the same dish as her dog, after the brute had taken a few licks.  She was  not  stable. 
  • I met [Kathy], also in 1999.  But, engaged already, she seemed unimpressed by me; though she appeared to enjoy me taking lots of pictures of her at the winter retreat. 
  • 2001 brought one strikingly beautiful, partially sighted camper to Beacon Lodge.  Though she smoked routinely, most of the other guys were drawn to her too.  Thus, competition was fierce for this one.  Plus, she had a boyfriend at home, and she was very religious besides. So, there would be no sneaking off in the dead of night with this one.  In spite of all that though, I wrote her a few times.  But she either did not respond at all, or what she did communicate was terse, and lacked any passion. 
  • Then, there was Lisa Davidson at the winter retreat in 2002.  However, she also had a boyfriend.  So we ended up not really getting together until the spring of 2004.  When we did, I found that she was a smoker as well, and actually rather needy.  She carried much baggage that I was ill-equipped to handle. 
  • Next, came counselor [Kandi] in 2003, who rejected me flatly  a couple years later, when I asked to rub her feet, even though she had previously allowed [Jack] to do it.  This crushed my ego, needless to say.
  • However, the one very good relationship that camp made possible, was (and still is) that with [Emmy]. I met her in 2003 and we built a friendship that nearly seven years later, has grown into the deepest, most abiding one I’ve ever experienced with either a male or female. Though   [Emmy]   and I are not romantically involved at this point, I suspect that if not for her coming to camp the past seven summers, I’d have stopped going myself much sooner.
  • From 2004 through 2007, I met no other intriguing women there.
  • In 2008, of all the female campers and counselors, just one 18 year-old,  [Prism], had me fantasizing over stealing away with her up to the a-frames or the Braille trail.  Towering over me at 6′ tall, she piqued my curiosity the very first time I saw her, in spite of her “pleasantly plump” figure.  Now usually, heavier girls do not interest me.  But this one did.  Unfortunately, she was notably aloof and seemed like she really didn’t want to be working there.   She shunned small talk.  More about her   here.
  • Surprisingly therefore, in 2009, [Prism] was back, and for the first two thirds of the session, acted precisely as cold as she had the year before: overly custodial, like she was taking care of unruly pets rather than adult campers.  She scolded as well, in this condescending, belittling tone, like a gruff old teacher.  But she softened over the last several days, toward me at least, presumably because she realized that I was (at least) her intellectual equal.  However, she has not written me, though I put my contact info right into her hand as I departed on the last day.  I’ll write more about this encounter later.

 

Thus, as I hope is obvious, camp accomplished   some   of what I hoped it would. But back in 1995, I guess I desired more.  I would have liked meeting four or five girls like [Emmy] over the fifteen years I’ve been going, instead of just the one.

Perhaps it’s unfair to expect camp to provide endless streams of fresh romances. But I suppose that it’s no less fair than the hunter, hoping that the forests he visits have lots of the sorts of prey that he wishes to bag.  If they don’t, then he does not hunt them.  As the saying goes: If you want to hunt elephants, then you go where the elephants are.  But it appears that camp has become a depleted forest for me, and to continue the metaphor, camp has proven to be one place where the elephants are usually   not.  Indeed, I find way too few potential lovers there, to make going and enduring the tight quarters and inevitable weight gain worthwhile.  So I must find more plentiful hunting grounds, I think.

Unfortunately I don’t stay attracted to most women for long.  Indeed, my greatest thrills of passion generally occur in the first week or two of a new affair.  But most of those in fact, lose that,    the   very first day.  Afterwards, the lady and I either become great   romance-less   friends, as has happened with [Emmy] and I, or we eventually drift apart, quite likely, forever.  However, this would be less of a concern at camp, if more eligible ladies came around. 

Nevertheless, I’m fortunate that [Emmy], loving soul that she is, has chosen to grow our friendship, rather than abandon it. Even though I can offer her no exclusivity these days, over the years she’s made the “desolate” periods at camp much less lonely than had she not been around.  When there are no ladies I desire at camp for romance, at least there’s [Emmy] there, for great friendship. Hanging with her makes those dry spells bearable.  Again, without her to soften the disappointments of finding no eligible women upon my arrival at camp, I’d have stopped attending camp long ago.

At camp for me, with so few interesting ladies attending, it has sometimes occurred that I’d meet someone on the first day (in fact, the only lady at that session that catches my eye at all), only to discover that she’s lost her charm on the second day.  Then, for the rest of the time, I have no one else to check out, to admire from afar, to admire from a little closer, and then finally, to pursue into the woods on some sultry evening, for an hour or two of passionate kissing. Indeed, by the time the woman I desire feels comfortable enough to indulge me, I’ve done lost the passion.  Then, there’s no one else to chase. 

I consider myself lucky though, even when all I find is this    abbreviated attraction, because usually,   no one there   interests me; not even on the first day.  So it’s sadly disappointing on the second day when I think that I’ve found a wonderful sweetie to enjoy for the rest of the session, only to learn that I’ve lost the fire.  Thus, romantically speaking, I’m usually quite bored at camp, from day two on.  But if greater numbers of attractive ladies came, I think I’d have a better chance at making a great love connection, and better enjoying all of the time in the session. Sadly though, these women seem to largely steer clear of camp.

Somehow, I must secure a steady stream of new women, and work that wellspring until I find one in the bunch who captures my heart, in a relatively permanent way.  I do want lasting love, though some might think that all I really wish to do is spread my desire around.  At camp, however, it’s typical that I only see one or two ladies a year that I’d want to approach.  In most sessions, I find none.   Thus, I may need to find richer hunting grounds.

“Rule ‘em in, and rule ‘em out.”  That’s what one therapist in the mid 1990s said when I discussed this with him.  “You rule in the ones you like, you keep them in as long as you like them, and then you rule them out soon after the relating to them stops feeling nice, and right.”  Now I certainly believe that I’m capable of enjoying a romantic relationship, for years at a time.  In fact, ultimately, this is what I desire; a lasting love relationship with one, very special lady.  But I’ve just had a lengthy run of bad luck when it comes to picking the lastingly beautiful women.  I’ve been hard pressed to find ones that like me enough to date me in the first place, and even on the infrequent occasions when some like that do appear, they do not hold   my   interest for more than a few short weeks.  Unfortunately, camp has not supplied   enough   of these longer-running types of romantic encounters and liaisons.  The cold truth is: Very few female campers (with the exception of [Emmy] and one or two others over the years, have been appealing to me.  Outside of people like [Emmy] there’s been no camper for whom I felt any electricity.   I so wish that  [Emmy]  and I could have found ways to keep the romantic fires burning for longer than just the first few months we knew each other.

Yes, it just might be time to try something else, besides camp.  But what?  Stand by.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

True Loves List

Monday, October 19th, 2009

These girls wooed me the most over all.  Not that they   all   produced the greatest sexual or romantic desire and gratification, though some of them did.  But at times while either pining for or dating each of these, I felt I could be with no one more suited to my tastes, morals, values, education level, religious beliefs, social status, and so on.   While grazing in these ladies’ pastures, the grass immediately surrounding me was always the greenest.  Indeed, there was no such thing as greener grass on the other side of the fence.  There may have been   equally   green grass; but none greener.  I sensed that I was dating among the best I could, and that there was none better.  Now I’ve dated many others besides these.  But only relationships forged with the ladies in this list appeared to be the best that a relationship could be; at least for a few months to a few years anyhow. 

And now, the list:

  1. [First Love]   in 1972 through 1990.
  2. [Molly]   in 1974.
  3. [Ann]  in 1974, and briefly in 2004.
  4. [Maniac]   in 1975.
  5. [BT]   in 1976.
  6. [Shaina]   in 1977.
  7. [Dawn]   in 1979.
  8. [Cher]   in 1981 through 1983.
  9. [Andrea]    in 1982.
  10. [Shelly]   in 1983.
  11. [Shanee]   in 1983.
  12. Paula Eide    in 1984.
  13. [Fannie]   in 1984 through 1987.
  14. [Kate]  in 1986 through 1987.
  15. [Lenee]   in 1988.
  16. [Elstan]  in 1988 through 2002.
  17. [Cassee]  in 1989, 1994, and 2000.
  18. [Renee]   in 1990 through 1991.
  19. [Juanita]   in 1991, 1994, and 2001.
  20. [Roberta]   in 1991.
  21. [Chrissy]   in 1993.
  22. [Emeebee]   in 1993-1998, 2000-2001.
  23. [Carlene J]  in 1993 and then again in 2000.
  24. [Melinda]  in 1995, and briefly in 2007.
  25. [Alandra]   in 1996-1997.
  26. [Judith]   in 1997-1998, 2010.
  27. [Vee] in 1997 -2002, 2006.
  28. [Kar]   in 1998-2002.
  29. [J]   in 1999-2000.
  30. [Lynn]  in 1999-2000.
  31. [Beejay]   in 2000 through 2001.
  32. [LizDee]   in 2002 and 2004, briefly.
  33. [Emmy]   in 2003, and 2005.
  34. [Kandi]  in 2003 through 2005.
  35. [Ballerina]   in 2004.
  36. [Linda]   in 2009.
  37. [Miss Independent]  in 2009.
  38. [Prism]   in 2009.
  39. [Elsee]   in 2009.

 

Click on each name link to see the posts that pertain to that lady.

Take care.

Tom Hesley

Seeking Pity, Getting Love

Sunday, October 16th, 2005

Dear [Mentat],

Yes, many questions float around in my head about how useful seeking pity will be. As noted, I don’t think a woman asking it of me would persuade me to give her a chance in love, particularly if I felt no carnal attraction. So, do I even have a right to expect such special dispensation from women? Am I crazy for hoping that someone else would be so moved if I’m not moved myself? I value those in-love feelings above all else in my relationships. Without those, as I see it, what’s the point of being in a relationship at all? It seems that most others feel likewise. They want to be in love, and they leave when they fall out. But if my imperfections keep women from loving me with passion as my experiences suggest, then am I wrong for wanting to be in love without being able to inspire similar feelings in women? No. I don’t think so.

Many have never experienced LAFS and so insist that it’s a myth. But this resembles the congenitally blind man, insisting that colors aren’t real because he’s never observed them. How meaningful is that? His prove-it-to-me attitude hinders his ability to assimilate new concepts and grow, because he rejects that which doesn’t get through the filter of his own experiences. Colors do exist, no matter how fervently he denies them. And like colors, LAFS too exists because studies show that between sixty-five and seventy-five percent of the population say that they’ve experienced it. Fortunately though, I need not take it on faith because I’ve seen it for myself long ago, as puppy love for   [First Love]   in 1972 as well as in several subsequent relationships. That passion along with its derivatives, survives to this day, and I must admit that if   [First Love]   were to request a new association tomorrow, I’d have trouble saying no, though I probably would say no. I still love her, though I’ve not seen her since 1990. The point is that people often dismiss LAFS as short-lived and superficial. But it does last in my experience, and in fact, the more quickly it comes on, the longer it will probably last, as discussed above. I’ve loved   [First Love]   now for thirty-three years, nonstop.

Though I have a better appreciation now of why women take a long time to warm up, I think, that at least for men and for many women as well, the slower attraction comes on the other hand, the more fragile it is, and thus, the less likely will it endure. Indeed this bucks conventional wisdom. But again, allow me to expound a bit more on my story with   [First Love]   to illustrate. As I said above, she took seven years, count ‘em,   seven years   to finally say that she loved me; no LAFS on her part. Even though her love germinated slowly, once bloomed it lasted but five short months. Then she left, without a backward look. Her love came slowly, and left abruptly. All those cans of pop I bought her at school meant nothing. The rose bush, the cards, the repeated requests for her hand at proms, all of it never really made her love me, not in the pleasantly enslaving ways of LAFS. If I’d realized then that her absent LAFS damned us as a couple, I’d probably have stayed clear. But what’s done is done, and I’m actually glad for those bitter-sweet times because of how they underscored the importance of the LAFS ingredient. [First Love] showed that a beloved without LAFS probably means long, cold times of uncertainty, pain, and eventual dream-doom for the lover.

I’ve loved women for whom the initial attraction (LAFS) was intense as well as those who inspired no such feelings, not even after years of knowing them. Comparing the two, the LAFS relationships by far fulfilled the most, because these rarely bored me. But when they did bore, on those occasions when that initial attraction faded, the resolve to stay in them nonetheless,   never   faltered. In the height of our happiness, [First Love's] body ceased to amaze me the way it had in school, just like the glass of water grows less interesting once a thirst is quenched. In high school, one look at her gorgeous legs and my heart would start beating fast, the penis would stand erect, and concentration on anything else but the fantasy of passionately caressing her became impossible. Of course prior to 1980, I never got to do that for real, and so, my unresolved passion for her only grew, intensifying the thrills of the fantasies. But once I had lived the dream a few times, the thought of it grew much less intriguing and foremost.

Also, those same fantasies stopped tasting as sweet because partly, the curiosity that fired them before 1980 was gone. Once we moved in together, [First Love]   was readily available in reality. So any time a fantasy occurred, I could immediately fulfill it before it could mature into the knee-weakening lust of deprivation which had so characterized the core of my existence in the 70s. In fact, at times that summer on Jackson Street,   [First Love]   would lay on the couch in bare feet, short shorts, and bikini tops. Yet I’d experience no longing as I beheld her, though this vision often appeared in highly charged fantasies in high school. She looked as plain as plain-Jane can look once my sexual cup (if you will) was full. Some might say that now was the time to move on to greener pastures.

Yet I never considered leaving her, because those initial sparks of LAFS, though gone, had ignited much hotter emotional flames in their wake. While in the beginning, the LAFS passions of physical attraction and curiosity were really all I cared to indulge, later they subsided, and while still important, contributed much less the reasons I wished to stay.   [First Love]   was smart (never airy), attentive, and thoughtful. Though less powerful, a pleasant non physical sensation of overall satisfaction emerged. The loneliness was gone, and the sense surfaced that I’d finally gotten what I wanted after all those years of campaigning and begging. Gone was my tendency to gawk at other babes in the street.   [First Love]   was undeniably among the most attractive women in the world, and she completely quenched the thirst for involvement with all [other] such ladies. No one could produce more pleasure and sense of fullness for me. Even at age nineteen, I knew there were no more loveable women out there, and though admittedly I hadn’t experienced many women to that point, with   [First Love]   loving me, I didn’t want to.

When we find someone good enough, the need to look for anyone better vanishes, and so we become unresponsive to the wooing charms of others. Returning to my water metaphor, completely quench a thirst at home for example, and you’ll stop desiring water anywhere else as well, so long as you return home periodically to drink. Why drink elsewhere when you’ve already got the best water at home?

Of course, along with the quenching of the thirst comes decreased desire for the water. This is normal and expected. But some folks mistake their faltering passion for it as a sign that the water itself has become less desirable. I point out that

1. the water being less desirable, and
2. desiring the water less

are two very different concepts although people typically respond to both phenomena identically – by seeking different water. They look elsewhere hoping to find “better” water – water for which they again thirst and subsequently enjoy drinking once more. But the water at home is still as good as it always was, though it might not seem so to the man without thirst. Chemically, it hasn’t changed, and thus would still quench even the direst of thirsts, if such a thirst still existed. So often people want to have their cake before them, yet eat it too. That is, they want to experience the highly pleasant feelings of desire being gratified, yet they also expect that desire to persist beyond its gratification so that they might repeat the pleasures of that gratifying experience indefinitely. This however is irrational because we’ll stop desiring even the most desirable water once we quench our thirsts. The same can be said of women.

As   [First Love]   quenched my thirst to bed with beautiful women, my excitement in the bedroom declined surprisingly fast. Briefly, I was saddened that those explosive passions didn’t appear more often, and never to the degree that they did during our first time or two together. But I figured that the same would happen with   any   woman, and this de-emphasis of the physical was just a normal part of any happy relationship. Indeed anecdotes abound about how over time, lovers spend less time absorbed in each others’ bodies. Mom spoke often of this, as have my sisters, and [our electronics teacher] as well. In fact, so does Maslow, more generally, in the preface to the second edition of [his book]   Motivation and Personality.   He suggests that when a basic need is satisfied, humans virtually always start taking for granted the object that satiated their thirst. They lose interest in it and often discard its gratifier, only to find later that their lust for it returns. Then, they have to acquire the object all over again to re-gratify themselves.

Had I stayed with   [First Love]   long enough, this might have happened. I might have fallen out of love and strayed eventually. But as I said, in our brief time together, never once did I behold another woman with any lustful longing, even though the excited passion for   [First Love]   had shrunken. [Our electronics teacher] described that initial magnetism as temporary, and being a man with a rich dating history who later became a good provider, he seemed qualified to offer useful insights into these issues of the heart. Further, in my case, how he described it was precisely how it was. The first couple times with   [First Love]   were wondrous, and after that, became unexciting and perhaps a little boring. But I knew all the while that   [First Love]   was a keeper, because as the fantastic interest in her abated, so too did my lust for other women. When completely gratified,   all   sources of carnal enjoyment become uninteresting, just like the one that is gratifying us. My passions for   [First Love]   indeed declined, but I knew better than to allow myself to believe that I no longer needed her. Though I didn’t   feel   the need, I was certain that it was still there just as certainly as the need for good water to survive is omnipresent, even during times when we don’t thirst for it.

However, it’s also true that we might stop desiring our water at home for reasons other than the mere fact that through sheer gratification, we want it less. We may learn for example when we next visit the water cooler, that someone has put sulfur in it. In this case, we would go looking elsewhere for better water, and rightly so. Though we desire the water at home less due to the sulfur, our thirst for it in general remains. Here, the water   has   lost its desirability. So while it follows that we’d stop desiring water when it ceases to be desirable, it’s not true that water stops being desirable merely because we stop desiring it.

When it comes to women, it’s important to know the causes of reduced passion so we can rightly decide whether to stay with our current lover or seek another. After all, we’ll never escape reduced passion. That is to say, whether she’s truly our lifelong dream girl or just someone we   thought   to be such (but learned later was not), in either scenario [reduction or loss] of lust will almost certainly result.

I don’t mean to brag. But I never had too much trouble telling the difference between real and apparent dream girls.

Involvement with a real one quells all passion for other women, while dating a near miss does not.

I’m proud to introduce real ones to my family and friends, but not so excited to have apparent ones come here.

Even after the love lust is completely gratified, I still wish to stay with the real dream girl, but [am] eager to leave apparent dream girls.
I know I’ve got a real keeper when there’s an implicit, highly intuitive sense that I can do no better, and wouldn’t want to, even if I could. With an apparent dream girl however, this certainty never comes, or if it does, only lasts for days after meeting her for the first time.
I only dream erotic scenes with real dream girls, and never about apparent dream girls. Thus I will not commit to a lady until she’s appeared in my dreams in the pleasing ways of love. Until she does, we cannot rightly conclude that she’s a real dream girl. After all how could a real one not appear in dreams as the ideal lover?

Real dream girls never stop feeling like dream girls, no matter what they say or do. Irrespective of how poorly   [First Love]   treated me for example, I still never questioned my love for her. I’ve always loved her, even today, in light of everything both good and bad I know about her. As stated above, I’d be hard pressed to turn down a new opportunity to date her (though my intellectual side would prevent me from becoming a doormat again). Apparent dream girls on the other hand, can easily make me doubt my resolve. All it takes is a foul word or tone, or too many incidents of them squeezing the tube of toothpaste in the middle, or leaving too many dirty dishes unwashed, and I’m ready to pack it in.   :-)

If forced, I’d give up my family for a real dream girl if they inserted themselves between us. But as happened with [Mim], I was grateful for their intervention because [Mim] was but an apparent dream girl.

A real dream girl instantaneously transmutes the historically selfish person into one of understanding and compassion. An apparent dream girl is much more subject to abuse because her welfare isn’t paramount in her boyfriend’s eyes. So all these cases of abuse you hear about? I bet most every one of them occur because the guy settled for an apparent dream girl and didn’t wish to hold out for the real thing.

Real dream girls really turn me around at levels that go much deeper than reason. Their internals become mine. What they value, I come to value too. And this is not simply a case of me hiding my real preferences to please them, because at the most internal levels, my preferences themselves actually change. Example: Though as a loveless man I’m convinced that I’ll never want children, I’ve observed this idealism to melt during times of involvement with ladies I truly loved ([First Love], [Emeebee], [Alandra], and [Judith]). Suddenly, the thought of a crying baby and all the hard work necessary to keep it safe and healthy seemed so natural, so right, and so fantastic. Yet when those relationships ended, I soon returned again to the prior dogma of being childless forever.

Real dream girls it seems, are the catalysts to this empathic merging. Apparent dream girls however, do not change us in this way. On the contrary, they may even strengthen our dogmas of single-hood. I never wanted children less, for example, than I did while dating [Mim]. Nor did I wish to “play the field” more. The fact that she wanted commitment and kids made no difference because her desires to me seemed like little gusts of wind along the path I’d already chosen for myself prior to ever knowing her. They did not alter that path, nor was I compelled to willfully resist it. Real dream girls however, rewrite our life desires and plans. Jim Croce seemed to miss this point in that song   I Got A Name   from 1973. He sings, “If you’re going my way, I’ll go with you.” One gets the idea that whoever it was to whom he was singing, was clearly not a real dream girl to him. It might have been an apparent dream girl, a family member, or his mother. Heck, it might have been some man like his father or boss, or anyone else whatsoever. But it was certainly not an apple of his eye, for he spends the whole song affirming his individuality and stand-alone strength. He says he has a name like pine trees lining a winding road, singing birds, and croaking toads, and like a north wind whistling down the sky, the whippoorwill, and the baby’s cry, he has a song. He makes sure we know that he sings that song loud. And he seems to disparage (just a little) the folks who aren’t so outwardly assertive, like his father, by saying, “And I carry it with me like my daddy did, but I’m living the dream that he kept hid.” Perhaps he’s never been touched by true love. To his real dream girl, he might have sang instead, “Well I know I could share it [his dream] if you want me to. And if you still want me, I’ll go with you.” Too bad he died struggling to affirm his aloneness.  I could go on and on, but I believe you get the idea.

I don’t know if I’ll ever find a real dream girl who thinks of me as a real dream guy. However, whatever it is that creates such a wonderful empathic disposition of oneness among true lovers is bigger than a person’s need for compassion or how they talk or how they look. Though surveys say that women by in large are turned off by neediness, I believe that the woman who eventually falls for me won’t mind, just as [Parkar's wife] doesn’t mind [his]. I’m only interested in ladies who’s attraction to men centers around his holistic essence, and not so much around his specific traits (like neediness, wallet size, Etc.). Thus, I feel more confident about seeking compassion. Who knows after all, where it could lead?  [I might end up,  dating up,  afer all.]

Okay, I’m done with this.

Tom Hesley

Related Posts

Elstan Update

Friday, December 13th, 2002

Dear [Tad],

Well, I think I’ve told [Elstan] in every way I know, both directly and subtly that I want her, and she has not responded positively. Can’t keep knocking my heart against that iron-clad door, which never seems to open for me.

It seems like that has been my problem for way too long with women. I find one I like and then I try too hard for too long to get her to let me into her life. I did that with   [First Love], [Emeebee], [Judith], and others you don’t know. I just need to quit sooner I guess. You’d think I would have learned my lesson by now. That is, if they don’t accept you immediately (or very close to immediately), they ain’t gonna accept you ever.

Tom